Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > NPL Blackforest 4v4 Tournament Criteria & Rules

NPL Blackforest 4v4 Tournament Criteria & Rules

 Sykorax


Joined:  15 November 2009
Posts: 394
Posted13 August 2014 - 1:48 pm
Good luck guys. The noob bashing will be strong with this one. :P
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 _Papillon


Joined:  27 May 2014
Posts: 3
Posted13 August 2014 - 1:57 pm
I'd like to know if there will official streaming for this tournament and, if we have it, will NPL player be allowed to join the casting crew?

I think i might not qualify, but I am an active NPL BF games player, i know almost everyone and I'd like to, if possible, help out streaming :D
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 [DZ]MajesticDefense


Joined:  19 March 2012
Posts: 196
Posted13 August 2014 - 2:03 pm
Isnt it a team tourney, then why does it say "Teams must be split evenly."
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 [PTBNS]fabking


Joined:  22 July 2012
Posts: 945
Posted13 August 2014 - 5:09 pm
At the moment brackets will be decided by VCOM Hosts (who is playing vs who).
I am not sure but on the first game the players will split fairly amongst the 8 and then the winning teams will be stuck with each other until the end .
I do understand that playing with random strangers can be a disadvantage sometimes.
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 Slash


Joined:  2 June 2013
Posts: 3155
Posted13 August 2014 - 5:13 pm
How about we make this a team tournament? I know lots f Npl clans , this might actually motivate them
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 [PTBNS]fabking


Joined:  22 July 2012
Posts: 945
編集済み13 August 2014 - 5:20 pm by [PTBNS]fabking
Lets wait for our main staff member MiCH to reply to some of these suggestions .
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 mich


Joined:  11 July 2009
Posts: 14494
Posted13 August 2014 - 5:56 pm
I won't be answering any questions about players that may or may not qualify. That is for the sign-up thread. This thread is for questions or suggestions in regards to the criteria that has been set.

Sign-ups will begin Saturday, August 23rd. I will create the Sign-up thread on this date. I will also list instructions for signing up.

I do believe we need to figure out the terms for the MS lounge games played. I have a considerable amount of games played in the MS lounge and I would still qualify for Division A. So I think these terms need to be discussed further.
Slash wrote:
How about we make this a team tournament? I know lots f Npl clans , this might actually motivate them

This is the first ever Official NPL Tournament, so restricting it to teams only will leave a lot of people left out. You don't have to be in a Team to play fmt (with your friends).

About Streaming, we currently don't have anybody stepping up to stream this. If you would like to stream, feel free.
Isnt it a team tourney, then why does it say "Teams must be split evenly."
This
At the moment brackets will be decided by VCOM Hosts (who is playing vs who).
I am not sure but on the first game the players will split fairly amongst the 8 and then the winning teams will be stuck with each other until the end .
I do understand that playing with random strangers can be a disadvantage sometimes.

VCOM Hosts will decide who plays who in the first Round. We will do the best we can to make sure the teams are split fairly on both sides of each team. After that, it will depend on who wins the first Round to go on to play in Round 2.
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 mich


Joined:  11 July 2009
Posts: 14494
編集済み13 August 2014 - 6:06 pm by mich
Edits are in red. Please discuss.
Division A (Beginners Ladder)
  • No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Beginners RM Ladder (minimum of 100 games, e. g. 80 Wins, 40 Losses).
  • No more than 400 games played on the Beginners RM Ladder.
  • Maximum of 200 games played in the MS lounge from 2012.

Division B (Intermediate Ladder)
  • No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Intermediate RM Ladder (minimum of 100 games, e. g. 80 Wins, 40 Losses).
  • No more than 200 games played on the Intermediate RM Ladder.
  • Maximum of 400 games played in the MS lounge from 2012. All ladders combined, but excluding the Intermediate Ladder. The Intermediate Ladder is mirrored with the NPL. DM games do not apply to this rule.
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 Arise_


Joined:  21 May 2013
Posts: 979
Posted13 August 2014 - 6:14 pm
-

It's hard to see someone using the Intermediate RM Ladder.
So how it's possible to fill divisionB

I'd get guys from MS, <1499 rated at 1v1 AND teamgames cuz there's a LOT.
After the decision that make NPL 1200, become pretty fair those ratings.
a 1300 in NPL sure is a 1300 in MS.
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 mich


Joined:  11 July 2009
Posts: 14494
Posted13 August 2014 - 6:20 pm
Arise_ wrote:
It's hard to see someone using the Intermediate RM Ladder.
So how it's possible to fill divisionB

There are quite a few people that play in the Intermediate Ladder.

http://www.voobly.com/ladder/view/Age-of-Empires-II-The-Conquerors/RMI

Arise_ wrote:
I'd get guys from MS, <1499 rated at 1v1 AND teamgames cuz there's a LOT.
After the decision that make NPL 1200, become pretty fair those ratings.
a 1300 in NPL sure is a 1300 in MS.

The MS ratings do not compare to NPL ratings at all. There is also no rating cap in MS. Also, the NPL was created only a few years ago compared to MS. Meaning a player could have 3000 games played in MS and still be at 14xx rating. Maybe he plays a lot of FFA or doesn't play fmt. There are many variables to make your statement untrue.
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 dreamergirl_


Joined:  25 June 2007
Posts: 799
編集済み13 August 2014 - 10:38 pm by dreamergirl_
I made and posted the awards.

Awards


1st%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png
2nd%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png
3rd%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 Popemi


Joined:  22 September 2010
Posts: 199
編集済み13 August 2014 - 7:50 pm by Popemi
mich wrote:
Edits are in red. Please discuss.

I agree with this suggestions,

[PTBNS]fabking wrote:

Division A (Beginners Ladder)

No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Beginners RM Ladder (minimum of 100 games, e. g. 80 Wins, 40 Losses).
No more than 400 games played on the Beginners RM Ladder.
Maximum of 200 games played in the MS lounge from 2012.


Division B (Intermediate Ladder)


No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Intermediate RM Ladder (minimum of 100 games, e. g. 80 Wins, 40 Losses).
No more than 200 games played on the Intermediate RM Ladder.
Maximum of 400 games played in the MS lounge from 2012. All ladders combined, but excluding the Intermediate Ladder. The Intermediate Ladder is mirrored with the NPL. DM games do not apply to this rule.


You´ve got my vote :)
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 Popemi


Joined:  22 September 2010
Posts: 199
編集済み13 August 2014 - 10:38 pm by dreamergirl_
I made and posted the awards.

Awards


1st%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png
2nd%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png
3rd%20NPL%204v4%20Blackforest.png

Looks nice :D
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 [DZ]MajesticDefense


Joined:  19 March 2012
Posts: 196
Posted13 August 2014 - 8:34 pm
its quite ironic if some1 has played 100s of games in npl and still cant play in npl tourney ;byecry
リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
 mich


Joined:  11 July 2009
Posts: 14494
編集済み13 August 2014 - 8:42 pm by mich
Please ask questions about the criteria guys. I need some feedback to make sure we can have this as fair as we can make it.
Division A (Beginners Ladder)
  • No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Beginners RM Ladder (Example: 20 games; 20 Wins, 3 Losses).
  • Minimum of 20 games played on the Beginners Ladder.
  • No AKA ratings > 1300.

Division B (Intermediate Ladder)
  • No players with a win/loss ratio of 2:1 in the Intermediate RM Ladder (Example: 100 games; 80 Wins, 40 Losses).
  • No AKA ratings > 1500.



リンク | 受信箱 | Quote
1[2]345678910111213
Displaying 16 - 30 out of 188 個のレス
カテゴリを移動:
2 User(s) are このトピックを読んでいる人 (過去30分以内)
0 members, 2 guests

What's popular right now:
Most active threads in past week: