7 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 7 guests
0 members, 7 guests
Lo más popular ahora:
Word Association (66 usuarios)
AoKTS updates (44 usuarios)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (43 usuarios)
1.6 reward campaing (33 usuarios)
€100 OPEN Challenge - CBA HERO (30 usuarios)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (29 usuarios)
TDII (28 usuarios)
Temas más activos de la semana:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (33 mensajes)
1.0c shows in game instead of 1.... (9 mensajes)
Error al lanzar la partida (5 mensajes)
WRONG GAME ROOM NUMBER INVITE (4 mensajes)
Setting up port forwarding in r... (4 mensajes)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (4 mensajes)
Error : 50000000 (3 mensajes)
The amount of points won/lost are smaller in general making the ratings more stable and representative of ones skill over time. I'm sorry if your rating had a big drop prior to the change, causing you to start from a lower point than you would have normally had, but you're not the only one to whom that happened.
the solution is that 1650 wins an 1800 ,the 1650 should gain lot of pts and the 1800 will loss less pts .this way no one fear to play anyone and the lower rates players get rewarded as they should be for their efforts to win an 18+ and the 18+ dont have a lot to risk when they do it! both in 1x1 and TG.and in case the 18+ players win as they should be they gain small amount of pts and the 1650 players lose small amount of pts either.
You do not get a reward e. g. points, if you have won a game. The purpose of Elo is to reflect your game skill, not the number of won games to quickly reach a certain rating level. What you describe above is working as designed. Please understand, that it will take a while, until you reach your real ELO. It is not intended, that you quickly reach 1800/2000 (or 1400/1200) by playing just 20 games. The higher/lower your ELO, the less the chance, to encounter a . This will be important, one you reach a real ELO rating of 1800.
If you win many points, as well as lose many points with every game you play, your rating will never reflect your game skill. It will just tell, whether you have won or lost most of your recent games. Even worse, this allows you playing with players, that are not on the same skill level like you, as well as with players that are much better than you or players, that are below your game skill.
[You must login to view link]
i copy paste it from your link .
i mostly play tgs and mostly rewarded an 8 pts avarage since new system started even if my oponnents is 18+
so it dosent look suitable to the quote..
i am 1750+ player in 1x1 and TG. atm this new system catched me when i was 1650 in TG. now its almost imposiblle to go back to 1750 in TGs
i will need literaly 20 wins in a raw or win 25 and lose 5 to get back to my rr which almost impossible in TG's since u dont always get the best players in team in the room.
https://www.voobly.com/match/view/25803394
I honestly don't see your problem. You are playing with two allied players who are almost 1900. What makes you think, you should win MANY points according to the ELO article on Wikipedia?
check this game
the avarage for my team was 1655 and the oponnet team was 1751 before the game started.
still we got only 10 pts for winning an 100 pts higher rated team
1v1 - 16 points
2v2 - 12 points
3v4 - 8 points --> in your case: +2 because of the ELO difference
4v4 - 8 points
Noteworthy is that those that gained are in general skilled players that used to be underrated in the old system and those that lost were overrated in the old system. Players that used to be 1550-1570, but definitely didn't belong there are now finally reaching the 1400s.
Overall players will have a rating that represents their skill level better down the line, which makes it easier to find skill appropriate opponents in the lobby.