Community Forums > Voobly Community > Age of Empires II: The Conquerors > Random Map > Should RM historical ratings be removed?
1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests
0 members, 1 guests
What's popular right now:








Word Association (56 users)

AoKTS updates (45 users)

1.6 reward campaing (23 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (21 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (20 users)

TIW 2020 Map votes (20 users)

Photos of Voobly Players (19 users)
Most active threads in past week:








THis record just pauses and im u... (5 posts)

Unable to spec 1.6 game data games (4 posts)

a problem in download (4 posts)

Nobody can play 1.6 anymore. (4 posts)

1.6 out of sync without player d... (4 posts)

Strange bug (3 posts)

Elite skins for 1.6 (3 posts)
I agree with this.
lolwut. It didn't touch CS. Wish it had though.
111111111111
Why do u think they make a new pool ? Because they realized ratings doesnt evolve as fast as it should as everybody still play against same level fellows.
And they want to remove visible ratings to let weak players accept good players in their TG, to mix-up everubody, so pros can win faster more games and get better rating as faster.
In other words it'll open a 6 months era of full smurfing.
Btw u have 3 RM games so i dont even know why u and other CS players are discussing on this thread and bias the vote.
The big problem is that high rated players are not increasing in TG ladder, because they only play vs other high rated players (they are not accepted in lower rooms) So we can see players like GTL_Chris with 1 win and 4 loses. Or [HyM]Cyclops with 0 wins and 2 loses.
I doubt that hiding rate of Chris or Cyclops will make them "unknown skilled", nevertheless ^^
If you wanna get away from smurfs just let them play with 1account each IP address
I think that would wokr