Editado 12 de enero de 2012 - 16:26 p.�m. por HulkHogan__
yea archy, it bothers me because nobody hardly plays hf anymore, whether you like it or not, you **** about the maps, they put hf in there.. and now u bash about the civ.... huns makes it a bit more fair for the non-blood players actually, it is more micro based slightly and offers a different kind of game to turk wars, having said that... it's only a tie breaker and because hf turks has already been used so many times in past tournaments, there shouldn't be a discussion about it really.
Myself, I like to think I play a wide range of maps, I certainly enjoy huns more in hf, because it's less easy to camp and more intense alot of the time, like a DM, in a fair war with turks, camping is common and it can last too long. I'd like to see Archers Blood changed to civ Saracens - it's the civ people play because the archers have some advantage over British ones, where by camping fails, maybe an upgrade unfair, or something... I 100% think it should be changed, but anyway, after this tourny I'd like to see dodgeball
All you need to do is throw in a few anti-camping triggers for archers blood, like making the players bases lower elevated where people can camp, and the middle ground all the same elevation.
Myself, I like to think I play a wide range of maps, I certainly enjoy huns more in hf, because it's less easy to camp and more intense alot of the time, like a DM, in a fair war with turks, camping is common and it can last too long. I'd like to see Archers Blood changed to civ Saracens - it's the civ people play because the archers have some advantage over British ones, where by camping fails, maybe an upgrade unfair, or something... I 100% think it should be changed, but anyway, after this tourny I'd like to see dodgeball
SUAZO, JOIN, GG ALL