sur voobly il y a trop de tricheur est ce ne sont pas les vrais tricheurs comme le plus grand hackers de tous aussi bien sur ESO que sur voobly A_Grenn ClydeBarrow ou Bonnieparker et ceux envoi des topic au modérateur pour éliminer ceux que les dénonces.
Alors ESO est de loin le meilleurs systeme car il permet de crée une liste de Hackers.
Hello, This topic started back in 2011 and I know most of those people actually now want ESO rating system. ESO rating system tells other a person true skill level, at the moment the rating doesn't mean anything.
I believe there are several topics about this on RTS Sanc site and everyone want ESO rating system implemented here.
Also, there should be a counter on total number of games played, rated or unrated.
ESO are much better because there is less of hacker voobly does nothing Appears when they complain that they have been hacked, points lost no its not made.
ESO are much better because there is less of hacker voobly does nothing Appears when they complain that they have been hacked, points lost no its not made
Someone mentioned that it would be great if Voobly can do something like ESO had like when you were doing a rated match, it searched for players and you wouldn't know who you would face or what map you would get.
If playing vs a player 100 points below gives you 4 pts for win and 40 for lose (?) isnt it obvious that it is a BAD rating system? This would make games at higher levels especially ridiculous. 2200 vs 2100 what a big difference
Wait, till you see the the rating system for AoE HD, which will be like AoT ESO rating system, everyone from Voobly AoC will leave Voobly because they'll like AoE HD rating system.
Alors ESO est de loin le meilleurs systeme car il permet de crée une liste de Hackers.
voobly n'est pas un bon systeme.
I believe there are several topics about this on RTS Sanc site and everyone want ESO rating system implemented here.
Also, there should be a counter on total number of games played, rated or unrated.
That would be SUPER cool!
@golden: that's not simple to do since we use LAN games to play.
If playing vs a player 100 points below gives you 4 pts for win and 40 for lose (?) isnt it obvious that it is a BAD rating system? This would make games at higher levels especially ridiculous. 2200 vs 2100 what a big difference
[LPT]Good, you're a noob!
Wait, till you see the the rating system for AoE HD, which will be like AoT ESO rating system, everyone from Voobly AoC will leave Voobly because they'll like AoE HD rating system.