5 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 5 guests
0 members, 5 guests
Что интересно прямо сейчас
Word Association (67 пользователи)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (45 пользователи)
1.6 reward campaing (44 пользователи)
AoKTS updates (35 пользователи)
RCB Fair Mod Discussion (26 пользователи)
Photos of Voobly Players (23 пользователи)
Most legendary aoe player (14 пользователи)
Самые активные темы за последнюю неделю:
1.6 not working with me anymore... (9 посты)
New CS EVENT (7 посты)
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (7 посты)
Error al lanzar la partida (5 посты)
i can't play in new player (3 посты)
1.6 EASY SYNC ERROR (3 посты)
Idle TC and quick classical vs E... (3 посты)
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM #1
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM #2
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM #1
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM #2
Need feedback.
1v1 - MS RM/DM
2v2 - MS RM/DM
3v3 - MS RM/DM
4v4 - MS RM/DM
easier yet
or
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM 1700+
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM 1700-
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM 1700+
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM 1700-
2v2 - MS RM/DM
3v3 - MS RM/DM
4v4 - MS RM/DM
easier yet
or
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM 1700+
1v1/2v2 - MS RM/DM 1700-
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM 1700+
3v3/4v4 - MS RM/DM 1700-
It was a simple Yes or No type feedback. What your suggesting is just causing more issues and is not fair for lower ratings.. If the lobbies are named to how I said it. This makes it easier to find games as well as variety of ratings so there would ultimately be no issues finding a game.
Edit: 3v3/4v4 don't need to be separated.
but anyway ¨yes¨
edit: actually No because is suboptimal
also about the player caps for lobbies: if i drop and want to restore a game or rejoin the gameroom of my friends, can we just stop playing because i cant rejoin a certain lobby?
and why the **** does CS need 4 lobbies? not like we have sooo many players there... any more than 1 for cs is just stupid.
Before posting another comment on how much you hate the new change, please keep a few things in mind:
1. The changes brought upon is a response to a dire situation of extremely high server loads amounting to frequent crashes, disconnections and time outs which needed to be addressed on priority. You as an individual may not have experienced it in your games however, a vast majority of players did as was obvious with the spike in tech complaints.
2. We just cannot have a huge lobby with a lot of players in it. No matter which way you package this idea, a higher number of players in any given lobby is directly proportional to the server load. While some of your suggestions are worth considering, you have to understand, we just can't have a lobby with 2k players in it.
3. Categorizing lobbies by rating or by player skill is also not a great idea as a lot of games on Voobly are played with players of all skills (especially the less popular maps which have smaller communities that obviously cannot be sliced further based on ratings
4. I admit that the lobby names are a bit confusing for someone to start with, and perhaps these can be changed at a later point and is not a big deal at the moment. Minor issues such as the count of premium rooms in every lobby or the long wait owing to the confusion among players on which lobby to join can be addressed easily.
We value your suggestions and would be happy to make corrections as necessary however, suggestions hinting at having a consolidated lobby so you can see all your friends in one place is perhaps a remote possibility.
Closed maps: BF, michi, FN, arena
Open maps: Arabia, blind random, LN etc
Add the info what maps you can play in the lobby, like this you can also make 3 or more lobby's if needed...
It would make it easier to find games and usually also your friends...
A split by rating is not good... Many low ranked players want to spectate games with high ranked players for example...
Another thing... Autoboot everybody who is more than half an hour afk, many players just don't turn off pc and keep lobby's open. They don't play but they use the server not needed...
There are almost no players who play DM, that will make not much difference imo...
Lobby connections do munch up bandwidth with an exponential increase of the number of players.
^ I have probably said that wrong but nevermind, I am still sleepy. It is a bit confusing with the lobby system change. - Don't like the Caps used in lobby description.
Justing saying what would help a bit, even though you could do it as dedicated RM and dedicated DM above the DM/RM lobby as a hint of where to play. Hopefully people will then play all proper games in DM lobby. But doing it more simply is probably more desirable.
Having two lobbies open shouldn't be an issue for players that want to play both, which is very few. Generally people get IM more.
Anyway just my thought, on getting like 50 to 100 (or more atm) players less in the main DM/RM lobby.
Also more support for single player/offline launching with voobly mods would be desirable.
I think it will be great if the game browser is removed and instead Game lobbies should be visible on all screen.
At least It'll be easier to recognize lobbies with tile representation or something like more visually appealing.
Currently i need to scroll through the long list and you know people hate reading and recognizing stuffs 11
Cheers,
How about also fixing the darn dashboard - why make it update every second and make the list jump? This is so painful when a person can't click to join a room quick enough? Probably the worst part of Voobly ( well, outside of installation )