to be honest, i think you're mediocre at best at ffa. i've seen you play, you know how to fight but you have absolutely no idea what is the best to get with your kings. i've seen you rush to harald and then cry because you got raped.
and stop this bull****. no it is ****ing not.
this is bull****, i'm premium member, known, high rated and i play in "18+ only" games as well, and that has NEVER happened to me. reason? nobody gives a **** about a single bbt, everybody wants razes, which you arent very likely to get when fireing at the same bbt as many other people, also you are trying to make your own bbt survive longer, so you have to kill the bbt from the guy next to you first.
blahblahblah. the connections are there so you can get razes and fight, even when somebody blocks your base. also it gives you another entrence to attack another player, so the base is harder to defend.
as long as the bomard towers arent invincible in 2v2v2v2 for the first 1:30 min, the civs arent balanced, also the herobalance gets lost (tamer for example is too cheap/strong in 2v2v2v2)
and after every game (when you quit the game) it even SAYS that the map is made for ffa...
and yet CBA is played as TG mostly. weird world, isnt it?...
and you know that you're garbage at ffa and wont win that, so what exactly is your point?
suchen is better at 1v1 than at ffa btw.
don't even know who u r bro, do u play rcb? dont enjoy taking criticism from some1 who ive never seen play 11
also maybe bc ur not very well known or #1 rated it could be that ppl dont care about u as u have more losses than wins? idk bro
the map has been edited 10000x , only the most recent edit (F12) says and i quote "ffa mode detected", it dsnt say its for ffa and there were versions before F12 spanning about 6 years with the base connections...........
^ strong rcb player u r bro, clearly u know map v well
and yah ur right, sucken sucks at ffa and is better at 1v1, but there our record is something like 46-4
im amazed u feel the need to say some1 is garbage at ffa 11 it's like, ffa games are random civs, random spots, usually a mix of players (some can feed others, sometimes on purpose, some can make 1 person win, some can be smurfs, some can purely be there to kill u if they dont like u)..... , to judge any type of skill even in FFA you're looking at non-biased players, all same rate, same level, fair spots (ie 8p) and tbf fair civs.. which is just impossible unless mirror really and unrepresentative of the game ...
^ if im next to dopey who i consider to be the top ffaer atm, if im sara vs him pers imo he stands v little chance, but reverse it i stand no chance.. is that fair? just luck.
so anyway seeing as this hasn't been tested and probably never will, your claims are void ...
i dont play often, i don't find it enjoyable bc i feel the map this time round is the worst it's been in a long time, but here are 2 of the 3 of my most recent games:
more so, in other types of rcb, namely 1v1 2v2 tg etc. i don't think you can say much at all, placing or winning every tournament ever hosted in igz/voobly for all diff versions of rcb, not to mention the fact ive played all diff versions of gold since 2004, as well as classic, auto, crash a spawn, blood, seige rambits (XXX, XxX), 10th etc.
oh as well as the fact im not a 1 mapper... and i play nearly all maps to the highest level...
but anyway, that was more of a rant about ppl saying i never play rcb, ive literally never seen u or heard of u in rcb , maybe bc u suck ..
ironically i cant remember ever playing ffa with you xD and looking at your account, yes, you do play ffa, but not that much to be honest (except if you have some smurfs that i dont know)
I do believe am one of the best, considering I win 70% of the time.
My games speak for themselves.
this is a lie. your 1v1 winrate is higher than 50%, so how can you explain your total negative score on your "main" account?
i guess you might be one of the best, havent played enough with you to say anything about that.
don't even know who u r bro, do u play rcb? dont enjoy taking criticism from some1 who ive never seen play 11
also maybe bc ur not very well known or #1 rated it could be that ppl dont care about u as u have more losses than wins? idk bro
you are one ridiculous person. we've already played against each other and wrote with each other and now you act all fame and ****. you know me and you know i'm better than you at ffa. that we barely ever play vs each other might be because you're mostly playing 1v1 and 2v2. only about 10% of your games are ffa and your performance in those isnt very convincing when your opponents are any good.
(see the games you posted, you won the one where all of your opponents were **** and lost the one where there was a decent opponent. whyever you posted the match links, i still dont get it.)
if you'd play ffa more often, we might meet more often as well. but you decide to take away the fun part about rcb and play it as a 1v1/2v2 map. your decision.
and since you are only hating on ffa because you suck at it you try to make a 2v2v2v2 or 2v2/1v1 tournament out of this since you know you wont do well in the ffa one anyway. so... i guess your opinion doesnt count...
and that i have more losses than wins might be because i play ffa. seriously, are you ****ed or what?
by the way, different account with more wins than losses while playing ffa and not only 1v1/2v2-whoring like you. http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/123665165/Ratings
the map has been edited 10000x , only the most recent edit (F12) says and i quote "ffa mode detected", it dsnt say its for ffa and there were versions before F12 spanning about 6 years with the base connections...........
^ strong rcb player u r bro, clearly u know map v well
and yet CBA has also been edited 10000 times, ironically it doesnt have those base connections and is still considered a TG map. isnt that ironic? are people playing that map wrong? or maybe dont the connections mean **** about how the map is played? and why is there a connection between edge players? so they can back up their enemy?
strong logic u have there, bro.
and yah ur right, sucken sucks at ffa and is better at 1v1, but there our record is something like 46-4
im amazed u feel the need to say some1 is garbage at ffa 11 it's like, ffa games are random civs, random spots, usually a mix of players (some can feed others, sometimes on purpose, some can make 1 person win, some can be smurfs, some can purely be there to kill u if they dont like u)..... , to judge any type of skill even in FFA you're looking at non-biased players, all same rate, same level, fair spots (ie 8p) and tbf fair civs.. which is just impossible unless mirror really and unrepresentative of the game ...
46-4 is a strong exaggeration, but whatever, he is better at 1v1 than at ffa, still he wants to play a tournament in that format, while you try to change it because you're... scared? i dont even know.
your second paragraph is full of your typical excuses that you bring up after losing a game. obviously it isnt fair in the sense of equality but still you have a chance of winning in almost all games, just that another player might take the chance or take away your chance, but if you are above average you will win more than 1/8th of your games and if you're really good much more.
yes, obviously, **** can happen and you get outcived, or have p2 with a terrible civ for that spot or you can get boated or another player gets too much food. against the first 2 you cant do much, well, happens, but vs the latter 2 you can prepare by using your kings properly and fight smart, if you dont, well your fault.
and maybe it is that randomness that makes this map interesting, but you wouldnt understand that, you serious little custom mapper. AOC is love, AOC is life! such competitiveness.
and you play ****ing CBA TG random civ and complain about randomness? seriously, how stupid are you? i bet you think roll the dice is only luck as well...
and yes, it is hard to determine "skill" by a few games, and if somebody wins the tournament (which will be like 10 games for the winning player? dont know, lets see) that obviously doesnt mean he's the best, the better player might lose due to the randomness of the map and opponents, but why not just play a tournament, even if it doesnt mean too much, just for the fun. but the concept of having fun doesnt seem to be too familiar to you, so maybe you shouldnt take part anyway.
so anyway seeing as this hasn't been tested and probably never will, your claims are void ...
suchen making stupid decisions in ffa or struggling with simple things sometimes is known and a fact.
the 2 games of you that i remember speak for themselves. one you were feeding because you bought vill and the other you rushed to harald with mayans and got smashed while crying about teaming and how unfair FFA is.
stupid decisions are proof enough, there is no need for testing. i'm making mistakes too, but not as severe as others, so yes, i claim that i am better than you at ffa.
more so, in other types of rcb, namely 1v1 2v2 tg etc. i don't think you can say much at all, placing or winning every tournament ever hosted in igz/voobly for all diff versions of rcb, not to mention the fact ive played all diff versions of gold since 2004, as well as classic, auto, crash a spawn, blood, seige rambits (XXX, XxX), 10th etc.
oh as well as the fact im not a 1 mapper... and i play nearly all maps to the highest level...
but anyway, that was more of a rant about ppl saying i never play rcb, ive literally never seen u or heard of u in rcb , maybe bc u suck ..
i never claimed to be any good at 1v1 or 2v2, i've only played one tournament in that format (2v2) and had to forfeit because my ally left. also i didnt play any other version of RCB, but i dont see how ANY of that is relevant for a discussion about an RCB F12 FFA tournament. so i'll have to assume that mentioning this is your way of hanging your **** out where it doesnt belong.
i dont care how good you are at 1v1, 2v2 or other maps, RCB ffa requires a completely different set of skills and knowledge than even 1v1 or TG.
yes, you're good at 1v1 and 2v2, yes, better than me, probably at other maps as well, but i dont give a ****. i think 1v1 is repetitive, boring and usually decided in 10 min.
but once again, amusing how you cant remember me even though we already played 1v1 CBA/hero and bloods vs each other and even wrote with each other during the RCB 2v2 tournament, amazing how terrible your brain is.
and where on earth did i say you never play RCB? i said you BARELY play ffa and you arent what i would consider good.
ironically i cant remember ever playing ffa with you xD and looking at your account, yes, you do play ffa, but not that much to be honest (except if you have some smurfs that i dont know)
this is a lie. your 1v1 winrate is higher than 50%, so how can you explain your total negative score on your "main" account?
i guess you might be one of the best, havent played enough with you to say anything about that.
we haven't played many FFa games because our time zones are very different I believe.
LegendxKiller: http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/124317822 - mainly all games FFA
DevilMayCry_: http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/123674046 - mainly all game FFA(I let that account die)
Now, I don't understand where you get the 1v1 rate thing, I don't really 1v1. I would believe you if you meant 2v2.
We've played a few games, but only when I have a day off.
well, 1v1/2v2 isnt too much difference from the basic idea and your win/los rate stays above 50% there. means in ffa you win less than 50% (when playing against decent opponents at least, smashing noobs makes 70% win-rate possible of course).
i personally think martelsinmiddle is the best ffa player, the ease with which he brought multiple accounts to 2k is just impressive. very consistent, good control and barely ever makes mistakes.
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
i believe that the top 20 page is pretty accurate if you take out the 1v1/2v2 players like zanchy, released beast, suchen.
(unsure how good releasedbeast actually is, i've seen him do dumb **** already but he seems to do well in ffa)
i personally think martelsinmiddle is the best ffa player, the ease with which he brought multiple accounts to 2k is just impressive. very consistent, good control and barely ever makes mistakes.
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
1+ good list , gar latly got stronger too,for me diaz is best ffa player but is not that big deal
I just said want ffa tourney but i never claimed that i top one so dont put me in compare,any way if we ddnt got rcb ffa now so we never will got one,hope nhobish orgnize one in end of this month or in start of july
well, 1v1/2v2 isnt too much difference from the basic idea and your win/los rate stays above 50% there. means in ffa you win less than 50% (when playing against decent opponents at least, smashing noobs makes 70% win-rate possible of course).
i personally think martelsinmiddle is the best ffa player, the ease with which he brought multiple accounts to 2k is just impressive. very consistent, good control and barely ever makes mistakes.
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
i believe that the top 20 page is pretty accurate if you take out the 1v1/2v2 players like zanchy, released beast, suchen.
(unsure how good releasedbeast actually is, i've seen him do dumb **** already but he seems to do well in ffa)
I agree, martelinmiddle aka hellrazor aka sineater aka standingbear is a great player and all others you have listed.
I don't struggle to stay 1950+, that's just a joke lol.
If I want I can reach 2k again without any problem.
The reason am at the rate I am now, it's because I don't pick and choose my allies for a few 2v2. I team anyone who wants to play, it can be 16+,17+,18+ it doesn't matter to me. I just want to play.
If you looking at player level according to their rate, you are totally wrong. I seen 15+ play better than a 18+.
01:06:45 Fugs_Bunny: do something...
01:06:48 Fugs_Bunny: stop camping on mid
01:06:49 Just_King_DT: I am
01:06:52 Rizi_Bajwa_Rox: jeags
01:06:55 Rizi_Bajwa_Rox: he lags
01:10:12 Fugs_Bunny: p7 wtf
01:15:49 [XceL]_GaR_ resigned
01:19:23 Just_King_DT: 111
01:21:12 Fugs_Bunny: help
11 wtf i doubt these ppl calling them good plyrs since they say themselves for **HELP** while fighting tamerlanes in base with khans. (the person is Mongols Khans and fighting with newbies tamerlane in base and still seeks help )
i will commit suicide if i do such act
You aren't going to get people to join this outside of the Voobly gamerooms. A pitiful amount of people participated last time. It needs to be a league type deal imo.
League should be based on brackets and games must be played with 8 players. Group of 16xx, 17xx, ...
My games speak for themselves.
Majority of games won vs 16++ and lower players...
and stop this bull****. no it is ****ing not.
this is bull****, i'm premium member, known, high rated and i play in "18+ only" games as well, and that has NEVER happened to me. reason? nobody gives a **** about a single bbt, everybody wants razes, which you arent very likely to get when fireing at the same bbt as many other people, also you are trying to make your own bbt survive longer, so you have to kill the bbt from the guy next to you first.
blahblahblah. the connections are there so you can get razes and fight, even when somebody blocks your base. also it gives you another entrence to attack another player, so the base is harder to defend.
as long as the bomard towers arent invincible in 2v2v2v2 for the first 1:30 min, the civs arent balanced, also the herobalance gets lost (tamer for example is too cheap/strong in 2v2v2v2)
and after every game (when you quit the game) it even SAYS that the map is made for ffa...
and yet CBA is played as TG mostly. weird world, isnt it?...
and you know that you're garbage at ffa and wont win that, so what exactly is your point?
suchen is better at 1v1 than at ffa btw.
don't even know who u r bro, do u play rcb? dont enjoy taking criticism from some1 who ive never seen play
also maybe bc ur not very well known or #1 rated it could be that ppl dont care about u as u have more losses than wins? idk bro
the map has been edited 10000x , only the most recent edit (F12) says and i quote "ffa mode detected", it dsnt say its for ffa and there were versions before F12 spanning about 6 years with the base connections...........
^ strong rcb player u r bro, clearly u know map v well
and yah ur right, sucken sucks at ffa and is better at 1v1, but there our record is something like 46-4
im amazed u feel the need to say some1 is garbage at ffa 11 it's like, ffa games are random civs, random spots, usually a mix of players (some can feed others, sometimes on purpose, some can make 1 person win, some can be smurfs, some can purely be there to kill u if they dont like u).....
^ if im next to dopey who i consider to be the top ffaer atm, if im sara vs him pers imo he stands v little chance, but reverse it i stand no chance.. is that fair? just luck.
so anyway seeing as this hasn't been tested and probably never will, your claims are void ...
i dont play often, i don't find it enjoyable bc i feel the map this time round is the worst it's been in a long time, but here are 2 of the 3 of my most recent games:
http://www.voobly.com/match/view/14042226
http://www.voobly.com/match/view/14172225
more so, in other types of rcb, namely 1v1 2v2 tg etc. i don't think you can say much at all, placing or winning every tournament ever hosted in igz/voobly for all diff versions of rcb, not to mention the fact ive played all diff versions of gold since 2004, as well as classic, auto, crash a spawn, blood, seige rambits (XXX, XxX), 10th etc.
oh as well as the fact im not a 1 mapper... and i play nearly all maps to the highest level...
but anyway, that was more of a rant about ppl saying i never play rcb, ive literally never seen u or heard of u in rcb , maybe bc u suck ..
My games speak for themselves.
i guess you might be one of the best, havent played enough with you to say anything about that.
also maybe bc ur not very well known or #1 rated it could be that ppl dont care about u as u have more losses than wins? idk bro
(see the games you posted, you won the one where all of your opponents were **** and lost the one where there was a decent opponent. whyever you posted the match links, i still dont get it.)
if you'd play ffa more often, we might meet more often as well. but you decide to take away the fun part about rcb and play it as a 1v1/2v2 map. your decision.
and since you are only hating on ffa because you suck at it you try to make a 2v2v2v2 or 2v2/1v1 tournament out of this since you know you wont do well in the ffa one anyway. so... i guess your opinion doesnt count...
and that i have more losses than wins might be because i play ffa. seriously, are you ****ed or what?
by the way, different account with more wins than losses while playing ffa and not only 1v1/2v2-whoring like you.
http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/123665165/Ratings
^ strong rcb player u r bro, clearly u know map v well
strong logic u have there, bro.
im amazed u feel the need to say some1 is garbage at ffa 11 it's like, ffa games are random civs, random spots, usually a mix of players (some can feed others, sometimes on purpose, some can make 1 person win, some can be smurfs, some can purely be there to kill u if they dont like u).....
your second paragraph is full of your typical excuses that you bring up after losing a game. obviously it isnt fair in the sense of equality but still you have a chance of winning in almost all games, just that another player might take the chance or take away your chance, but if you are above average you will win more than 1/8th of your games and if you're really good much more.
yes, obviously, **** can happen and you get outcived, or have p2 with a terrible civ for that spot or you can get boated or another player gets too much food. against the first 2 you cant do much, well, happens, but vs the latter 2 you can prepare by using your kings properly and fight smart, if you dont, well your fault.
and maybe it is that randomness that makes this map interesting, but you wouldnt understand that, you serious little custom mapper. AOC is love, AOC is life! such competitiveness.
and you play ****ing CBA TG random civ and complain about randomness? seriously, how stupid are you? i bet you think roll the dice is only luck as well...
and yes, it is hard to determine "skill" by a few games, and if somebody wins the tournament (which will be like 10 games for the winning player? dont know, lets see) that obviously doesnt mean he's the best, the better player might lose due to the randomness of the map and opponents, but why not just play a tournament, even if it doesnt mean too much, just for the fun. but the concept of having fun doesnt seem to be too familiar to you, so maybe you shouldnt take part anyway.
the 2 games of you that i remember speak for themselves. one you were feeding because you bought vill and the other you rushed to harald with mayans and got smashed while crying about teaming and how unfair FFA is.
stupid decisions are proof enough, there is no need for testing. i'm making mistakes too, but not as severe as others, so yes, i claim that i am better than you at ffa.
oh as well as the fact im not a 1 mapper... and i play nearly all maps to the highest level...
but anyway, that was more of a rant about ppl saying i never play rcb, ive literally never seen u or heard of u in rcb , maybe bc u suck ..
i dont care how good you are at 1v1, 2v2 or other maps, RCB ffa requires a completely different set of skills and knowledge than even 1v1 or TG.
yes, you're good at 1v1 and 2v2, yes, better than me, probably at other maps as well, but i dont give a ****. i think 1v1 is repetitive, boring and usually decided in 10 min.
but once again, amusing how you cant remember me even though we already played 1v1 CBA/hero and bloods vs each other and even wrote with each other during the RCB 2v2 tournament, amazing how terrible your brain is.
and where on earth did i say you never play RCB? i said you BARELY play ffa and you arent what i would consider good.
this is a lie. your 1v1 winrate is higher than 50%, so how can you explain your total negative score on your "main" account?
i guess you might be one of the best, havent played enough with you to say anything about that.
we haven't played many FFa games because our time zones are very different I believe.
LegendxKiller: http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/124317822 - mainly all games FFA
DevilMayCry_: http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/123674046 - mainly all game FFA(I let that account die)
Now, I don't understand where you get the 1v1 rate thing, I don't really 1v1. I would believe you if you meant 2v2.
We've played a few games, but only when I have a day off.
i personally think martelsinmiddle is the best ffa player, the ease with which he brought multiple accounts to 2k is just impressive. very consistent, good control and barely ever makes mistakes.
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
i believe that the top 20 page is pretty accurate if you take out the 1v1/2v2 players like zanchy, released beast, suchen.
(unsure how good releasedbeast actually is, i've seen him do dumb **** already but he seems to do well in ffa)
Red Lion is furious and wants hot prey whethers its zanchy or noob suchen
Just BRING IT ON ! ! !
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
I just said want ffa tourney but i never claimed that i top one so dont put me in compare,any way if we ddnt got rcb ffa now so we never will got one,hope nhobish orgnize one in end of this month or in start of july
i personally think martelsinmiddle is the best ffa player, the ease with which he brought multiple accounts to 2k is just impressive. very consistent, good control and barely ever makes mistakes.
after that are hellrazor, scar, rizi, diaz, me.
with you i'm not really sure, you seem to struggle to get above 1950 again.
i believe that the top 20 page is pretty accurate if you take out the 1v1/2v2 players like zanchy, released beast, suchen.
(unsure how good releasedbeast actually is, i've seen him do dumb **** already but he seems to do well in ffa)
I agree, martelinmiddle aka hellrazor aka sineater aka standingbear is a great player and all others you have listed.
I don't struggle to stay 1950+, that's just a joke lol.
If I want I can reach 2k again without any problem.
The reason am at the rate I am now, it's because I don't pick and choose my allies for a few 2v2. I team anyone who wants to play, it can be 16+,17+,18+ it doesn't matter to me. I just want to play.
If you looking at player level according to their rate, you are totally wrong. I seen 15+ play better than a 18+.
01:06:45 Fugs_Bunny: do something...
01:06:48 Fugs_Bunny: stop camping on mid
01:06:49 Just_King_DT: I am
01:06:52 Rizi_Bajwa_Rox: jeags
01:06:55 Rizi_Bajwa_Rox: he lags
01:10:12 Fugs_Bunny: p7 wtf
01:15:49 [XceL]_GaR_ resigned
01:19:23 Just_King_DT: 111
01:21:12 Fugs_Bunny: help
11 wtf i doubt these ppl calling them good plyrs since they say themselves for **HELP** while fighting tamerlanes in base with khans. (the person is Mongols Khans and fighting with newbies tamerlane in base and still seeks help )
i will commit suicide if i do such act
League should be based on brackets and games must be played with 8 players. Group of 16xx, 17xx, ...