and if u want best of 3 games of 8 ppl then i suggest u to not to drop winner in next game coz it will unbalance since if 7 ppl then p1 and p7 are at huge advantage , p2 p6 wont get mid advatange and cant go heroes like charlegmne and robins ,
similarly for 6 ppl p5 and p2 wont get razes.
so if u want bo3 then let it b 8 ppl.
giving points to heroes isnt a good idea since in bo3 or in whtevr if a person dies 10 sec after taking khans/haralds then i think he would get meaningless points
In my Oponion just disable chat in RCB FFA tourney, then it will b a decent tourney.
i knw still ppl will go team for top kill/rate. but by disabling chat they cant say something like **i go left , u go right**
**open him, i sent beli,theo,willi**
or **get mid and i help u** etc and blah blah
One thing more, we Learn from out mistakes doesnt matter if this tourney doesnt go well in future we can improve our mistakes and arrange more decent tourney
Manipulation is part of RCB FFA.
Also, unfair spots could be compensated with +1 point perhaps, if I should go with the scoreboard method.
the most stupid part of this whole thing is rewarding people for living longer, this is just not the way rcb is played 11
every game bar none ive killed the strongest opponent first IF ive had the chance, and that should go to any1 with their brain screwed on, so games where noobs get left to last bc they have 0 chance of winning will be rewarded..
the most stupid part of this whole thing is rewarding people for living longer, this is just not the way rcb is played 11
every game bar none ive killed the strongest opponent first IF ive had the chance, and that should go to any1 with their brain screwed on, so games where noobs get left to last bc they have 0 chance of winning will be rewarded..
^c'mon u can do better than that 11
yea,dying first or dying last one, dosent mean thing as whos better,all map is about who win it
What if 36 players signed up then make 6 pool of 6 and then we get 6 winners and those 6 play together gets first , then remaining 5 play and get second and then 4 person ffa for third.
It's not a fair game if there's less than 8 players, the guys on the edges get at advantage and the guys next to the guys on the edges get shafted. A FFA tournament just isn't going to work.
It's not a fair game if there's less than 8 players, the guys on the edges get at advantage and the guys next to the guys on the edges get shafted. A FFA tournament just isn't going to work.
ffa 5-8 players is fine,as i saw in rcb rooms no much ppl really care about got bad spot or not ,althout those bad spots won enouph games, ffa tourney can work easy
But tbf ffa with 8 players is not that great game,most of it have mega feed and end up with 3+ players have harlds or someone near global in 1 hour,best thing for it 2v2v2v2,but it can tried if the winner will not play next game so other game with 7
I agree with Suchen, being BBT ****ed is a minor problem in FFA and usually has no impact.
Also, I thought of an option to vote for underdog players, who are not that great, they could be positioned on those edge spots, if needed. However, I will keep thinking for a different formats to figure out what would be the best.
11 it has a big impact if you're say goths vs pers and you want to go magne to have any chance but your bbt died first because 5 players hit it at once.................
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
11 it has a big impact if you're say goths vs pers and you want to go magne to have any chance but your bbt died first because 5 players hit it at once.................
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
Shush, you glibbering fool. There is never a situation 5 players hit your BBT at the start of the match. Moreover, you seem to forget the BBT is immortal for a good period of time and you will be easily able to razings, if actually using the BBT to target.
And who are you to say the scenario was designed for 2v2v2v2? Did you ask the creator himself? And by that logic CBA should be played 2v2v2v2 just because of the layout.
Edit!
I am even sure that, even if I hosted a 2v2v2v2 RCB tournament, one of you 7ths would complain about the view angle and being able to create blocks that cannot be easily attacked. Stop making a fuss about minor things that most players do not even mind, after all in a random RCB FFA game you are not able to choose what spot you are, what civ you get or if the game is going to be 8p or less (unless you are the host).
Shush, you glibbering fool. There is never a situation 5 players hit your BBT at the start of the match. Moreover, you seem to forget the BBT is immortal for a good period of time and you will be easily able to razings, if actually using the BBT to target.
And who are you to say the scenario was designed for 2v2v2v2? Did you ask the creator himself? And by that logic CBA should be played 2v2v2v2 just because of the layout.
Edit!
I am even sure that, even if I hosted a 2v2v2v2 RCB tournament, one of you 7ths would complain about the view angle and being able to create blocks that cannot be easily attacked. Stop making a fuss about minor things that most players do not even mind, after all in a random RCB FFA game you are not able to choose what spot you are, what civ you get or if the game is going to be 8p or less (unless you are the host).
Hes not familiar much with rcb f12 map so leave it
11 it has a big impact if you're say goths vs pers and you want to go magne to have any chance but your bbt died first because 5 players hit it at once.................
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
Buy vills and rape persa,if u in weird way couldnt buy mang,anyway mang is sux after last edition,halbs and huskar and arc cavas may fk him, persa can bulid 2 castels with vills and 2 from king store so its 6 castles max till min 25 while he got his free stones,u can got so strong nevisk and use to fight or finish
similarly for 6 ppl p5 and p2 wont get razes.
so if u want bo3 then let it b 8 ppl.
giving points to heroes isnt a good idea since in bo3 or in whtevr if a person dies 10 sec after taking khans/haralds then i think he would get meaningless points
i knw still ppl will go team for top kill/rate. but by disabling chat they cant say something like **i go left , u go right**
**open him, i sent beli,theo,willi**
or **get mid and i help u** etc and blah blah
One thing more, we Learn from out mistakes doesnt matter if this tourney doesnt go well in future we can improve our mistakes and arrange more decent tourney
Manipulation is part of RCB FFA.
Also, unfair spots could be compensated with +1 point perhaps, if I should go with the scoreboard method.
every game bar none ive killed the strongest opponent first IF ive had the chance, and that should go to any1 with their brain screwed on, so games where noobs get left to last bc they have 0 chance of winning will be rewarded..
^c'mon u can do better than that 11
every game bar none ive killed the strongest opponent first IF ive had the chance, and that should go to any1 with their brain screwed on, so games where noobs get left to last bc they have 0 chance of winning will be rewarded..
^c'mon u can do better than that 11
But tbf ffa with 8 players is not that great game,most of it have mega feed and end up with 3+ players have harlds or someone near global in 1 hour,best thing for it 2v2v2v2,but it can tried if the winner will not play next game so other game with 7
Also, I thought of an option to vote for underdog players, who are not that great, they could be positioned on those edge spots, if needed. However, I will keep thinking for a different formats to figure out what would be the best.
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
Shush, you glibbering fool. There is never a situation 5 players hit your BBT at the start of the match. Moreover, you seem to forget the BBT is immortal for a good period of time and you will be easily able to razings, if actually using the BBT to target.
And who are you to say the scenario was designed for 2v2v2v2? Did you ask the creator himself? And by that logic CBA should be played 2v2v2v2 just because of the layout.
Edit!
I am even sure that, even if I hosted a 2v2v2v2 RCB tournament, one of you 7ths would complain about the view angle and being able to create blocks that cannot be easily attacked. Stop making a fuss about minor things that most players do not even mind, after all in a random RCB FFA game you are not able to choose what spot you are, what civ you get or if the game is going to be 8p or less (unless you are the host).
And who are you to say the scenario was designed for 2v2v2v2? Did you ask the creator himself? And by that logic CBA should be played 2v2v2v2 just because of the layout.
Edit!
I am even sure that, even if I hosted a 2v2v2v2 RCB tournament, one of you 7ths would complain about the view angle and being able to create blocks that cannot be easily attacked. Stop making a fuss about minor things that most players do not even mind, after all in a random RCB FFA game you are not able to choose what spot you are, what civ you get or if the game is going to be 8p or less (unless you are the host).
and as damian said, going on edges is big deal, need to make it 8p... but then why not do 8p 2v2v2v2 the way the map was designed and built for
I marked down some notes from your post and will consider them.
11 i have more FFA wins combined than both of u put together x 20 and less total games than 150