Eot_ v FIz

Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > Eot_ v FIz

Eot_ v FIz
Subscribe

Joined:	15 October 2013
Posts:	1331

Posted 3 February 2016 - 5:16 am

[Eot_]Trumplaris wrote:

then p1p2p3 vs p4p5p6 for RCB? and which civs will you guys remove?

Yes,will be frank,byz,turk

Link | Reply | Quote

LcamiloGil

Joined:	16 December 2015
Posts:	70

Posted 3 February 2016 - 3:39 pm

we veto woa too

Link | Reply | Quote

[Eot_]Trumplaris

Joined:	1 January 2010
Posts:	7526

Posted 3 February 2016 - 3:43 pm

We replace it with KM all japs.. 146 (Eot_) vs 235 (FIz)

Link | Reply | Quote

LcamiloGil

Joined:	16 December 2015
Posts:	70

Posted 3 February 2016 - 3:47 pm

KM is king moves? if yes then we veto it

Link | Reply | Quote

[Eot_]Trumplaris

Joined:	1 January 2010
Posts:	7526

Edited 3 February 2016 - 4:00 pm by [Eot_]Trumplaris

Graves 123 Span Frank Teut

& Army maybe edit your post with the map lists... the final maps are all listed just take out Smosh and add Graves there instead.

FIz has used all 3 of their veto's on
Smosh
WoA
KM

Link | Reply | Quote

['RB']Dan

Joined:	17 May 2012
Posts:	7313

Posted 3 February 2016 - 4:02 pm

have fun playing desert blood!

Link | Reply | Quote

Army1_VCom

Joined:	5 February 2012
Posts:	755

Edited 3 February 2016 - 5:35 pm by Army1_VCom

Eot Map picks

1v1
AB Saracens p1

2v2
CBA hero 2v2 p1 (Brit) p3 (byz)

3v3/4v4
Graves Spain, Franks, Teut (123)
Lustful (125) Mong Byz Saracen

FIz Map picks

1v1
CBX 1v1,FIz blue,(celt)

2v2
Desert blood p1 and p2 all brit (Immunity used)

3v3/4v4
Rcb 3v3\4v4 ,p1,2,3,8 vs p4,5,6,7 frank,byz,turk,viki
Nova 3v3/4v4 , p1,3,5,7 vs p2,4,6,8 ,all celt

Vetos:

FIz has used all 3 of their veto's on
Smosh 3v3/4v4
WoA 3v3/4v4
KM 3v3/4v4

Eot has used 0 vetos

Scheduled for the 7th of February at 6pm GMT

Link | Reply | Quote

[Eot_]Trumplaris

Joined:	1 January 2010
Posts:	7526

Posted 7 February 2016 - 8:10 pm

Just to be clear Score is 3-0 right now for Eot.

We took 1v1 set / 2v2 set
and won FIzs first home map RCB.
FIz needs to replace nova with a new map as it was veto'd by us.

Remaining maps are still graves & lustful to be played TBA.

Link | Reply | Quote

xEddy

Joined:	21 August 2015
Posts:	468

Edited 7 February 2016 - 8:47 pm by xEddy

****ty clan, leaving just because we vetoed their map even tho it wouldn't change anything.

Link | Reply | Quote

[7th]x4AwaKeNg

Joined:	15 October 2013
Posts:	1331

Posted 7 February 2016 - 8:47 pm

If it will no change anything,then u would play it,anyway sry I really needed to leave,we do games tomorrow or other day u want men,hope Sean don't make unnecessary comments again as he said we will not veto any of our picks

Link | Reply | Quote

bukayosaka

Joined:	9 January 2016
Posts:	1083

Posted 7 February 2016 - 8:54 pm

Eot were likely planning to use veto on random if they had needed to. Maybe.

Link | Reply | Quote

xEddy

Joined:	21 August 2015
Posts:	468

Posted 7 February 2016 - 8:55 pm

[7th]x4AwaKeNg wrote:

Because no one likes the map and no one wanted to play?

What Sean meant that time was "For now we will not veto anything, not sure about later" anyone smart would have gotten it.

Link | Reply | Quote

[7th]x4AwaKeNg

Joined:	15 October 2013
Posts:	1331

Edited 7 February 2016 - 8:58 pm by [7th]x4AwaKeNg

If u know English eddy ,u will release that he's not meaning right now,and tbh we use vetos early on thread coz he said that,we will say our replacement map later

Link | Reply | Quote

bukayosaka

Joined:	9 January 2016
Posts:	1083

Posted 7 February 2016 - 8:57 pm

xEddy wrote:

Because no one likes the map and no one wanted to play?

What Sean meant that time was "For now we will not veto anything, not sure about later" anyone smart would have gotten it.

why would you not veto desert before vetoing nova