Make the 1v1 and 2v2 sets bo3 instead of bo5.

Yeah we can do both 1v1 and 2v2 as bo3. For 1v1 it would mean 3 different players. Though if we do that i would want to increase it to bo5 come the semi finals

1v1 and 2v2 combined should worth same points as 3v3/4v4 round.

This

This!

So how about
1v1 round Bo5 - 3 points
2v2 round Bo3 - 2 points
3v3 round Bo5 - 5 points

Seems a good compromise for people who think the 3v3 round should be worth more points than the others.

Since its a clan tournament i'd argue switching it round would be better (why would u want 1v1 worth more than 2v2 in a CLAN tournament?)

so

1v1 round bo3 - 2 points
2v2 round bo5 - 3 points
3v3 round bo5 - 5 points

however, i personally think 1v1/2v2 round should be worth just 1 point each and should be bo3 each.

We would always have to have an odd number with regards the points in total. But as is being suggested imagine if you lost 1v1 and 2v2 rounds, you would be 5 points down before any of the 3v3/4v4 games are played. This would mean a clan would only need to win one game in the 3v3/4v4 section. If we had that system for TIW 2015 results on who won wouldve been different on who won overall sets and we wouldnt have had all the quality team games that we had as clans wouldve lost motivation to complete their set.

If making a change i would be more in favour of bo3 for 1v1 and 2v2 and keeping it as 1 point for those sets. But has mentioned i would be wanting to increase it to bo5 come the semis

or find a way 1v1 and 2v2 can be finished 3-2 not 5-0

I agree with this.

Its a clan tournament and not a few to one people carry. I can imagine some lame ****s picking CBA Hero in 2v2 and picking Maya/Aztecs as civs. That would be a) a one man carry and b) a match nobody wants to watch or play. But hey, I know some people who play for points and not for good games, so it wouldnt surprise me if that happened.

Other than that I think Army nailed it saying the good games are the 3v3/4v4 ones, so the tournament shouldnt have the possibility to end after the 1v1 and 2v2 round already.

So imo either make it

1v1 - bo3/bo5 - 1 point for the set
2v2 - bo3/bo5 - 1 point for the set
3v3/4v4 - bo5 - 1 point per match for a total of 5 points

or

1v1 - bo3/bo5 - 1 point per match
2v2 - bo3/bo5 - 1 point per match
3v3/4v4 - bo5 - 2 points per match for a total of 10 points

You guys are wanting 1v1 and 2v2 to be worth the same as the 3v3/4v4 in total? so assume a team wins both the 1v1 and 2v2 sets... they go into the TG set 5-0 up.. need to win ONE home map in 3v3/4v4 to win everything? This entire concept of this tournament was taken from the RM tourney counter part.. 1v1 was a bo3.. 3 simultaneous 1v1s and whichever team won 2 of the 3 took one point. If you guys had it your way the tg set would literally be void in most cases probably and most of the ggs we all want to see and like to watch would be gone... most will not play out a full set after they have lost 6-0 just because they lost 2 smaller sets and then one home map.

Reducing the length of time to play is very important. The three 1v1s occurring at the same time would be perfect.

It just occurred to me. With three 1v1s occurring at same time need to break down the potential 1v1s into 3 different map packs/groupings from the voted upon maps. That way you can have the appropriate player chosen and probably higher quality games.

For example if this was RM you would have the water map 1v1, the LN/nomad 1v1, and the arabia 1v1

CS... Group 1 CBA, Hero, RBC.... Group 2 smosh, vets, AB... Group 3 Khans, gwarz, germs

You get the idea

What im going to go with for the 1v1 and 2v2 section is both will be best of 3 and both will be worth 1 point each. For the 1v1 section it will require 3 different players, yes i get it that its a good idea to have games being played at the same time however at most we can only have 2 games at the same time because we dont know if a decider is needed (however i want to see the random round played anyway just in case i have to use it for clan placement in the group if both clans end up on equal points). With that said i dont think we should enforce the games being played at the same time for a number of reasons. Firstly because i know players like to watch the game their team mate is playing and secondly because we would like to try and stream the games and it will be harder to have both games streamed. I think it is best if we leave it to the players on the day themselves if they want to play the games at the same time and not enforce it.

I will though be increasing the 1v1 and 2v2 section to bo5 come the semi final stage. I know it is a lengthy point to play for but that single point on each of those sections could be the difference on whether you win or lose.

If you want it optional to where not all 3 1v1s are happening at the same time thats fine... as long as its set up each time so that its 1 person playing a map only.. so you have 3 pre selected players to represent your clan in your HM.. your opponents HM... and one random decider match.