RCB 2v2 Tournament

 ['RB']nhoobish


Joined:  8 August 2010
Posts: 3314
发布28 December 2015 - 4:48 pm
Teasers wrote:
Sign me up

You are banned from all VCOM events, have a nice day.
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 MobbDeep


Joined:  14 May 2015
Posts: 12
发布28 December 2015 - 5:19 pm
Sign me up
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 ['RB']nhoobish


Joined:  8 August 2010
Posts: 3314
发布28 December 2015 - 5:23 pm
MobbDeep wrote:
Sign me up

Never!
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [7th]x4AwaKeNg


Joined:  15 October 2013
Posts: 1331
发布28 December 2015 - 5:41 pm
Mate,i try it with beast and other two 19xx players,was kinda boring game,anyway i dont care spots,but why you dont just make rules like players used to play with,no need try new **** rules now
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 ['RB']nhoobish


Joined:  8 August 2010
Posts: 3314
发布28 December 2015 - 6:44 pm
The rules are there to make it more interesting, the usual 2v2 RCB can be boring, but with switched positions it has more potential. If you are talking about the civilizations, it is a same civilization tournament (mirror/team random), but with me announcing the civilization beforehand and then everyone picking those civilizations ingame. Noo ne will go Random civilization.
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [7th]x4AwaKeNg


Joined:  15 October 2013
Posts: 1331
编辑29 December 2015 - 2:16 am通过[7th]x4AwaKeNg
I meant positions,If someone go archers ,he will not be able to fill his ally towers,also with vills no much place to build,or when team lose mid,will can't rush mid together or I can't help my ally when they send tamers to finish him also can't send vills to make some defends for him,etc,u just kill map fun, still dunno why u think it will be more interesting
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [Me_]Zanchy____


Joined:  30 November 2012
Posts: 2595
发布29 December 2015 - 10:00 am
i gotta agree with suchen, tower filling archer civs (i.e maya NOT mongols) fill both towers, it's a tactical thing between having pop and having all units in towers, also deciding between imp or castles...

but I guess since it's p1p3 any further skill or interest in the game will be gone lol
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 ['RB']nhoobish


Joined:  8 August 2010
Posts: 3314
发布29 December 2015 - 10:41 am
So you both are telling me that camping mid with tamerlanes is much more fun than having to fight on 2 different fronts at the same time? And it is supposed to be a challenge to get hold of middle, not easy fill all towers with archers and then just wait at the base of towers until all the enemy towers have been razed.
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [7th]x4AwaKeNg


Joined:  15 October 2013
Posts: 1331
编辑29 December 2015 - 11:07 am通过[7th]x4AwaKeNg
if your problem is camp in mid,this will not fix it,u just kill map tactics, fight in corners will be just feeding,anyway its tr, faster team get mid,otherwise if team camp in mid,other team can terb usefull with p1,2 vs p3,4,or nevisk,or get hero +vills and rush
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [Me_]Zanchy____


Joined:  30 November 2012
Posts: 2595
发布29 December 2015 - 3:11 pm
yeah camping in middle with tamerlanes is boring but regardless of p1p3 vs p2p4 one side will win mid and that side will put tamerlanes on middle (either p1 or p4)...

all changing the pos does is stops archer civ tactics and 2v1ing at gates (tactics) for 2v2

don't get us wrong; we must look like whinners, we appreciate what you're trying to do, but the reality of it is if you want to stop tamerlanes, only way is to block or remove them

also the best war would be p1p8 vs p2p3

链接 | 回复 | 引用
 ['RB']nhoobish


Joined:  8 August 2010
Posts: 3314
发布29 December 2015 - 3:48 pm
How about P1&P3 vs P2&P8? =)
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 [7th]x4AwaKeNg


Joined:  15 October 2013
Posts: 1331
发布29 December 2015 - 3:52 pm
How about P1&P3 vs P2&P8? =)
rofl stop this,,,
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 LcamiloGil


Joined:  16 December 2015
Posts: 70
发布29 December 2015 - 11:06 pm
i preffer p1,2 vs p3,4
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 _acidrocker


Joined:  9 September 2013
Posts: 84
编辑30 December 2015 - 4:33 pm通过_acidrocker
p1&p5 vs p2&p6 please ;whip
链接 | 回复 | 引用
 NicKeL_


Joined:  2 November 2009
Posts: 240
发布30 December 2015 - 7:32 pm
just get rid of tamerlane for tournament


链接 | 回复 | 引用
1[2]34
从 16 30中展现56 - 0
讨论区跳转:
1用户正在阅读这个话题 (在过去的30分钟)
0成员1游客

Most active threads in past week: