On the subject of smurfs, Eot have a 2k rmer that only uses his Eot name in wars/tournaments for them in Europe.
Eot are just massive hypocrites and now want another rule changed in their favour.
On the subject of smurfs, Eot have a 2k rmer that only uses his Eot name in wars/tournaments for them in Europe.
Eot are just massive hypocrites and now want another rule changed in their favour.
You mean the guy who has been in eot since september 2012 (much longer than the 'new' version of 7th has existed) and plays exclusively on his eot name? and has played a lot of europe (and smosh) with us? http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/5993/Matches
You really are missing the point. We can play CBA, we are actually pretty good at CBA although not so active in it...but their blatant exploitation of the rules is ridiculous.
If we wouldve waited till after the 1v1 round to use the same veto, they wudnt be able to use hero or cba for the 2v2 pick as they wouldnt then be able to shuffle the entire map list around..
But instead we're punished for vetoing early to give TAOE a chance to pick a new map by their entire shuffling around of the map list, and we're not allowed to withdraw our veto.
Man, I do agree with you about the holes in the veto system. I don't agree in top CS players complaining about playing CBA, and some sentences from you and Polaris suggested it.
As CBA seems pointless to you, Europe (just to mention one) seems pointless to me, but still it's part of CS.
It's a highly subjective opinion, and since you're a top CS clan, you should play and accept challenges in every maps. Even the ones you find for noobs.
Since they are the most played, and this tournament is a CS one, CBA maps popping out is just normal.
You don't like it, and TAOE wants to making you uncomfortable by picking them. This seems a strategy, not a faggot plan.
You dont get our problem really... and trust me we dont mind playing CB's vs TAOE... and I didnt say CBA is pointless... I respect its a popular map... but its popularity is based on majority of noobs playing it who cant really play anything else... Quality of blood games is much much higher than CBA.. and thats just a fact... Same with quality of Euro games and id pick quality over quantity everytime.
if a team doesnt feel as strong as another in a map... such as most clans (besides vicious) vs us in graves.. they shouldnt have to be forced to waste 2 vetos to avoid it vs us.. or same with Europe (2 vetos) they should be able to use 1 veto and avoid it entirely.. same goes for weaker teams in CB's... then all this tournament becomes is a battle of using cheap picks/ maps to get wins.. instead of ggs.
DO NOT POST YOUR MAP PICKS UNTIL RIGHT BEFORE YOU PLAY THEM
Each team knows the all the possible maps that can be picked... no need to know the exact pick ahead of time to 'train' because we all are already aware of the possibilities.
I believe each team has the right to alter their picks until they are played depending on their team members available and how the set is proceeding.
You dont get our problem really... and trust me we dont mind playing CB's vs TAOE... and I didnt say CBA is pointless... I respect its a popular map... but its popularity is based on majority of noobs playing it who cant really play anything else... Quality of blood games is much much higher than CBA.. and thats just a fact... Same with quality of Euro games and id pick quality over quantity everytime.
I get your point, and I do agree on the sh1tty veto system.
CBA is massively played by the almost totality of the community, so level goes from noob to pro and there are only few who are top players. Bloods, conversely, are played by few people who already have a big knowledge of the maps, but there are no noobs, simply because people don't even try to play them.
Your quality > quantity is based on poor promotion of blood maps, imo. But let's leave that for another thread.
this tournament is so gay... takes ages to get a game on the gayest maps noone wants to play because they are only picked to beat the opponent.
no fun at all...
I would have thought that quality of gameplay will be more in a map that is played by a huge spectrum of players rather than a map that is played by a select few. More players ensure more variety and richness. Thats the law of nature. Everyone has their jewels to play with and everyone thinks his is the only jewel worth playing with. Nothing new here. And frankly, some of those maps you drooling over has actually got stupid looking kings that move from 1 place to another, just to blow up everything that is there on the map. Just saying...
little correction i got bored of the little drama chat between vicious and eot so i left and the rest of taoe just follow with me
^^^ everytime ,in any room , eot is always involve in some 'chat' war and we dont have enough time to watch it
but ggs had fun playing with charlie and some other eot guys!
Eot are just massive hypocrites and now want another rule changed in their favour.
Eot are just massive hypocrites and now want another rule changed in their favour.
http://www.voobly.com/profile/view/5993/Matches
If we wouldve waited till after the 1v1 round to use the same veto, they wudnt be able to use hero or cba for the 2v2 pick as they wouldnt then be able to shuffle the entire map list around..
But instead we're punished for vetoing early to give TAOE a chance to pick a new map by their entire shuffling around of the map list, and we're not allowed to withdraw our veto.
Man, I do agree with you about the holes in the veto system. I don't agree in top CS players complaining about playing CBA, and some sentences from you and Polaris suggested it.
It's a highly subjective opinion, and since you're a top CS clan, you should play and accept challenges in every maps. Even the ones you find for noobs.
Since they are the most played, and this tournament is a CS one, CBA maps popping out is just normal.
You don't like it, and TAOE wants to making you uncomfortable by picking them. This seems a strategy, not a faggot plan.
if a team doesnt feel as strong as another in a map... such as most clans (besides vicious) vs us in graves.. they shouldnt have to be forced to waste 2 vetos to avoid it vs us.. or same with Europe (2 vetos) they should be able to use 1 veto and avoid it entirely.. same goes for weaker teams in CB's... then all this tournament becomes is a battle of using cheap picks/ maps to get wins.. instead of ggs.
DO NOT POST YOUR MAP PICKS UNTIL RIGHT BEFORE YOU PLAY THEM
Each team knows the all the possible maps that can be picked... no need to know the exact pick ahead of time to 'train' because we all are already aware of the possibilities.
I believe each team has the right to alter their picks until they are played depending on their team members available and how the set is proceeding.
I get your point, and I do agree on the sh1tty veto system.
CBA is massively played by the almost totality of the community, so level goes from noob to pro and there are only few who are top players. Bloods, conversely, are played by few people who already have a big knowledge of the maps, but there are no noobs, simply because people don't even try to play them.
Your quality > quantity is based on poor promotion of blood maps, imo. But let's leave that for another thread.
no fun at all...
Eot 1st.
ViCiouS 2nd.
TAOE 3rd.
for group A.
^^^ everytime ,in any room , eot is always involve in some 'chat' war and we dont have enough time to watch it
but ggs had fun playing with charlie and some other eot guys!