If you going to expand the 2v2 to bo5, put 2 points for the 2v2 round at least.
1v1's bo3 - 1 point
2v2's bo5 - 2points
3v3' - rest
11... dont suggest things like this without talking to damian first... it doesnt benefit you guys so he will have something to say about it... you want to change the 1v1 set to a bo3 (damian wont agree) and change 2v2s to 2 pts (damian wont agree) he already thinks the 1v1 set should be worth same pts as the tg set.. so imagine
11... dont suggest things like this without talking to damian first... it doesnt benefit you guys so he will have something to say about it... you want to change the 1v1 set to a bo3 (damian wont agree) and change 2v2s to 2 pts (damian wont agree) he already thinks the 1v1 set should be worth same pts as the tg set.. so imagine
I don't care what Damian think, i have my own suggestions, and btw i though 1v1's were bo3 not bo5.
I dont know why we should extend 2v2's if there arent more points involved, and if we expand it at least add more maps to the 2v2 pool, or do it like the 1v1's , each player only can play 2 maps.
the games take long enough as it is... I personally am totally for having an extra home pick in 3v3 but I think people may have a problem with it.
1v1 has always been bo5.. 2v2 was bo3.. and it was changed to bo5 for the semis/final matches... 1v1 and 2v2 were always worth 1 pt for those sets... and now both are worth 1 pt and bo5's as well.
Could possibly add a few more maps in 2v2 seeing how its been expanded not sure what everyone elses thoughts on it are. There is still plenty of options available without adding.
then you need to add maps in 1v1 as well... either do it to both or dont do a change to anything.. 10 maps for a 2v2 and 10 maps for a 1v1 are perfectly fine.. only 4 get chosen
sorry, sir but we weren't informed about that. i mean its ok if 3/4 clans have agreed on it but no1 has asked us.
is there anything else we should know bout recently updates on tournament?
sorry, sir but we weren't informed about that. i mean its ok if 3/4 clans have agreed on it but no1 has asked us.
is there anything else we should know bout recently updates on tournament?
I had always planned on expanding the tourney come the semi stage and was even gonna make the 3v3/4v4 section 3 home picks each and a random round as well but felt it would take too long to complete a set so just increased the 2v2 set.
The only changes that have been made are 2v2 is bo5, nova can be played odds v even and map picks are done on the day of the tourney which was clearly wanted by majority on this thread
11... dont suggest things like this without talking to damian first... it doesnt benefit you guys so he will have something to say about it... you want to change the 1v1 set to a bo3 (damian wont agree) and change 2v2s to 2 pts (damian wont agree) he already thinks the 1v1 set should be worth same pts as the tg set.. so imagine
Why would I not want that? 11 u joke men. The whole reason this tournament is weighted towards 3v3/4v4 is because Eot aren't very strong at 1v1/2v2.
The tournament idea was all based on the WiC format... it had a bo3 simultaneous 1v1 round... a 2v2 bo3 DM round... and the rest and heavy weight of the tournament itself was 3v3/4v4s as its a CLAN tournament.
and why would you want the only category out of the 3 sets where 7th has an advantage to go from a bo5 to a bo3? You guys are weak in 2v2 and 3v3... dont get me started on 4v4 (lucky for you guys we cant force you to play us in 4v4s)
if you are so much superior to the other team in 1v1/2v2 (your words) you are 2-0 going into tg set... then you win both of your home picks and you win the set by default already...
We already know 7th wont be picking maps that they picked vs all others as it is... too scared to pick gwarz/germs vs us in 1v1.. too scared to pick 2v2 graves/gwarz vs us in 2v2... and too scared to pick vetz/gwarz/WoA vs us in tg
1v1's bo5 - 1 point
2v2's bo5 - 2points
3v3' - rest
1v1's bo3 - 1 point
2v2's bo5 - 2points
3v3' - rest
I don't care what Damian think, i have my own suggestions, and btw i though 1v1's were bo3 not bo5.
I dont know why we should extend 2v2's if there arent more points involved, and if we expand it at least add more maps to the 2v2 pool, or do it like the 1v1's , each player only can play 2 maps.
1v1 has always been bo5.. 2v2 was bo3.. and it was changed to bo5 for the semis/final matches... 1v1 and 2v2 were always worth 1 pt for those sets... and now both are worth 1 pt and bo5's as well.
is there anything else we should know bout recently updates on tournament?
is there anything else we should know bout recently updates on tournament?
I had always planned on expanding the tourney come the semi stage and was even gonna make the 3v3/4v4 section 3 home picks each and a random round as well but felt it would take too long to complete a set so just increased the 2v2 set.
The only changes that have been made are 2v2 is bo5, nova can be played odds v even and map picks are done on the day of the tourney which was clearly wanted by majority on this thread
and why would you want the only category out of the 3 sets where 7th has an advantage to go from a bo5 to a bo3? You guys are weak in 2v2 and 3v3... dont get me started on 4v4 (lucky for you guys we cant force you to play us in 4v4s)
We already know 7th wont be picking maps that they picked vs all others as it is... too scared to pick gwarz/germs vs us in 1v1.. too scared to pick 2v2 graves/gwarz vs us in 2v2... and too scared to pick vetz/gwarz/WoA vs us in tg