I've watched enough of the game. seen the stats, read your posts. You had a far superior imp civ and lost so i don't really understand what the post is about... it's not unusual to hold 2v1 for a bit celts vs aztecs in imp....aztec have nothing to counter pals
"aztecs have nothing to counter paladins" aztecs v celts and you think he should be building paladins.. for real...?
looking forward to seeing more matches from you