Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > April 15th NOW - Deathrow 2v2

April 15th NOW - Deathrow 2v2

 UserID123476158


Join Date: 5 February 2012
Posts:298
Edited 30 March 2012 - 5:53 pm by [I3acI]_Taff
Who is going to run this one?

Can we post it ip pls..
Link | Reply | Quote
 _IYIastA_


Join Date: 23 August 2011
Posts:3559
Edited 19 March 2012 - 10:01 pm by _IYIastA_
Well. I will. I managed well enough with sleep deprivation last night and now have more experience in it.

But ofc if anyone else wants to :)

I'll post it up now though.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [NSA]ForgiveMe_USA


Join Date: 5 September 2007
Posts:117
Posted 20 March 2012 - 6:24 am
Should fix this

'Players: R1 - Blue/Red vs Green/Yellow; R2 - Blue/Green vs Red/Yellow; R3 - Blue/Yellow vs Red/Green'

P1/P2 have big advantage over P3/P4. If you want to do it this way give the team with the fastest victory the choice between R2/R3 spots if a tiebreak is needed.
Link | Reply | Quote
 _IYIastA_


Join Date: 23 August 2011
Posts:3559
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:28 pm
Should fix this

'Players: R1 - Blue/Red vs Green/Yellow; R2 - Blue/Green vs Red/Yellow; R3 - Blue/Yellow vs Red/Green'

P1/P2 have big advantage over P3/P4. If you want to do it this way give the team with the fastest victory the choice between R2/R3 spots if a tiebreak is needed.


I just threw that up off the top of my head, you change it to whatever fits.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [NSA]ForgiveMe_USA


Join Date: 5 September 2007
Posts:117
Posted 20 March 2012 - 7:51 pm
Your hosting so its your decision to make :P.

I always prefer side v side *1/3 v 2/4* with the option to switch host.
Or give each team the option to select spots excluding 1/2 v 3/4.
Link | Reply | Quote
 UserID123138440


Join Date: 19 October 2009
Posts:55
Posted 20 March 2012 - 8:55 pm
How long does an average 2v2 Drow last? I've never played actually played it with same civs but wouldn't bo3 take too long?
Link | Reply | Quote
 Pestilence_


Join Date: 14 March 2012
Posts:1388
Posted 20 March 2012 - 11:55 pm
It's faster than Gwarz from experience. I don't think a BO3 is necessary until the final.

Hero control and middle control are huge features of the map, so the games are naturaly a lot faster and positions aren't too strictly important. There's no villagers so no BBTs or rewalling. Same map minus villagers basically.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [NSA]ForgiveMe_USA


Join Date: 5 September 2007
Posts:117
Posted 21 March 2012 - 9:18 am
I think bo3 is ok.

If more than 16 teams maybe do bo3 final 2/3 rounds.
Link | Reply | Quote
 _IYIastA_


Join Date: 23 August 2011
Posts:3559
Edited 22 March 2012 - 2:07 pm by _IYIastA_
Its one map so it will be bo3. If we get a massive turnout then obviously that will change.

I'm planning on doing a few different civs.

First round I'll do a weak archer civ just in case people try to full camp... this shouldn't really work but meh I'd like the early games to finish fast.

At the semi stage I'd like to mix things up and do two civs. Any suggestions on this?
Link | Reply | Quote
 Pestilence_


Join Date: 14 March 2012
Posts:1388
Posted 23 March 2012 - 4:38 am
Teutons, Franks, Mongols, Saracens.
Link | Reply | Quote
 _IYIastA_


Join Date: 23 August 2011
Posts:3559
Posted 23 March 2012 - 8:50 pm
Goths
Huns
Aztecs
Tuetons/Saracens - Semi?
Franks/Mongols - Final?



Thats depending on numbers.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [NSA]ForgiveMe_USA


Join Date: 5 September 2007
Posts:117
Posted 26 March 2012 - 7:15 am
Id stay away from saracens... 2 good players in an even match will turn into a hit n run fest
Mongols are fine but kinda similar to Saracens. Mongols would be a good final civ.
Other four civs are fine. I like Aztecs but might want to avoid them also because of no Knights.
Link | Reply | Quote
 _IYIastA_


Join Date: 23 August 2011
Posts:3559
Posted 26 March 2012 - 2:31 pm
Id stay away from saracens... 2 good players in an even match will turn into a hit n run fest
Mongols are fine but kinda similar to Saracens. Mongols would be a good final civ.
Other four civs are fine. I like Aztecs but might want to avoid them also because of no Knights.


Okie dokie. How about we just keep it simple and do same civ in all rofl. I will heed my own advice and keep it simple.


Ok Aztecs/Sara out.

Goths
Huns
Franks
Tuetons
Mongols
??
Link | Reply | Quote
 [NSA]ForgiveMe_USA


Join Date: 5 September 2007
Posts:117
Posted 26 March 2012 - 2:44 pm
I think Huns would be funny. Bracer Khans + Tarkens. Sab games would be uncommon.

Teutons is what I would choose if you were only going to use one civ.
Also fine w/ Mongols or Franks.
Link | Reply | Quote
 Pestilence_


Join Date: 14 March 2012
Posts:1388
Posted 26 March 2012 - 3:16 pm
I would recommend having some people test the civs in some friendly games. I might come on tomorrow, want to test some civs Charlie?

This way we can see what's possible, how players can lame and we stamp it out, what civs will stall games. A variation in civs each round promotes more competitive play in such a map as Drow. Mongol play is utterly different from Teutons. And Drow play is way different from Gwarz play.


Link | Reply | Quote
[1]234
Displaying 1 - 15 out of 48 posts
Forum Jump:
1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests

What's popular right now: