2 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 2 guests
0 members, 2 guests
What's popular right now:








AoKTS updates (76 users)

Word Association (39 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (31 users)

1.6 reward campaing (28 users)

TIW 2020 Map votes (17 users)

BF EB - Round 3 [Final] (17 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (16 users)
Most active threads in past week:








1.6 georgians not able to upgrad... (5 posts)

Impossible to play - voobly keep... (5 posts)

XQ NO ME PUEDO UNIR A NINGUNA SALA (4 posts)

1.6 recording ends before game ends (3 posts)

1.6 full random default (3 posts)

WE CAN'T CHAT IN PRIVATE ON VOOBLY (2 posts)

problem with spec mode (2 posts)
Ideas please on what we run. Something small only with maybe 1 map.
Ideas?
maybe cba hero same civ?
diff civ per round, that would v very nice.
cbx is also a possibility.
have u thought of doing a version of rcb? there are quite a few, some much faster then others,
such as auto..
cbf 2v2 same civ sounds perfect, no?
we discussed this too, cba hero would get more sign ups
but ... it's a mini cs event.. we decided cba hero could and would be a long night
with lots of sign ups and deserves a bigger tourny.
however, if it were to be cba hero id go for diff civs each round , if 2v2
celt maya then turk byz then sar byz then mong sar
very varied game types there.
+1
CBF 2v2 ftw xd
Everyone ok with this?
Would adding an Anti-Camp feature be a good decision? Could do same AC as CBA.
Defeating an opponent in CBF is difficult before imperial so this would speed up slow games.
settings?
P1 & P2 vs P3 & P4
Vikings and Brits same civ????
Thoughts......I want to start posting it up and advertising.
I would just suggest staying away from civs like pers/kors/turks/spans.
Vikings and Brits sounds ok or can alternate each round.
i mean same as cba sounds good,
civ combos such as
sara byz
maya celt
brit vik
jap mong
jap span
i dnt see a problem with any civs really providing they are infantry/cav + archers,
i would never personally do 2 x archer civs, would be a camp war.
Also, I would stay away from the civs charlie said, but span/turk are fine providing they're with inf/cav imo..
Spanish you can use but the combo of paladin + the bbc accuracy is also very defensively strong.
Levent made a suggestion to make the passageways wider into the bases. I think this should be considered as well as the anti camp addition.