anyways i already explained my op about why would IC win that, its now on army do the call based on experienced players or who knows...
and please @army tell them to stop their bs with the "xcs plan", as you can see they can't even explain what is it, thats just for ****ing generate drama...
explain to everyone here why we want IC to get more points if they lost the set anyways? @rick ?? lmao
sean you suck in lustful man, people would rather look towards my op than yours(even when you go and ask xcs about their op lmfao) when what do you want is get an exact answer, really it's like if I give my op in one smosh tg match and people would rather hear me than your op lol
I dont need to explain anything about it Javi. If army asks me in private ill explain to him the whole reason you're so bias and interested in seeing IC lose by the closest possible margin though. He can also then see why you will say anything you can to try and get a point out of this for your friends at IC. Isn't it great that I ask your own clanmates opinions of the game and even they agree with my opinion and the vast majority that Dy had that game pretty comfortable?
God, what they do is talk pure **** to confuse, from the beginning the same.
I dropped x3 times in the lustful game, and came back, we waited 2-3 hours for Dy's team to come back, being a game still undecided.
Quote:
If the same player constantly disconnects, they / their team will lose and the other player / team will advance to the next round. The exception to this rule is if the tournament has not progressed beyond the first round. A replacement may be added to the offending team.
If the game cannot be resumed, we will try to view the recorded game. If a player / team was to win without question, they will be awarded victory. If there was no obvious winner, the game will play in the same settings.
Clearly rules, Crack or redrum could be replaced, or me /Demo, also since they both did not return, and we advanced other games (2 hours between them:Dodgeball,Gwarz,RCB) .//
The game was not obvious, DY advantage from vills 4/2, from tc 2/0, galleys 20/5.
But they had a clear disadvantage of militarily ground: IC Had 3 stables and 8 kts, for Dy 1 stable and 4 kts, you don't mention that, do you, Rick / Polaris? Great analysis by hiding figures that do not suit you, how impartial you are.
We(IC) also had 4 siege workshops and we had 10 catapults, and Dy only had 2 siege w, and 2 catapults.
The 2 villagers from Redrum were locked up, and the most probable is that Dy was going to run out of space to build, since the 3 of them were together in the same place.
And remember something, genius, in case you don't know, the monks can convert villagers, and there was a minimal chance that Mascherano (he had 2 monks) would get villagers again.
It was clear that it was the deadline, and each game had to be played, I lost 30 minutes of time adding all the drops, so, I repeat, i do the forfeit in RCB, to recover that lost time.
Stop crying, that for every drop, I went back to the minute, I never stopped entering, and I agreed with the Army rule in the dodgeball v5 match (my favorite map and I dropped too), that if I dropped again, I would lose automatically.
The rules are clear, do not manipulate them in your view to appear impartial (when clearly arent).
I dont need to explain anything about it Javi. If army asks me in private ill explain to him the whole reason you're so bias and interested in seeing IC lose by the closest possible margin though. He can also then see why you will say anything you can to try and get a point out of this for your friends at IC. Isn't it great that I ask your own clanmates opinions of the game and even they agree with my opinion and the vast majority that Dy had that game pretty comfortable?
Btw, the forum title doesnt say Eot either
Yes, Sean, start with your conspiracy theories, just like Zanchy accusing me of playing for another clan, and where is the evidence?
Without seriousness both
Just to talk to get attention and seem intellectual, you shouldn't even be here, just supporting Dy, to "seem impartial", when you hide the part that doesn't suit you, great
And yes, it is already agreed, xCs, would let me win 7-0, so that they beat Dy 7-0, ok?
That is your fear, there it is, you dont need to be mysterious, and then the clan of your best friend, whom you defend in every post, would get out ):, bad, it couldnt be the final Dy Vs Eot , behave maturely now.
You do realize everytime I come into your guys business its only after an xCs posts first, right? Otherwise I stay clear. Show me a single thread between Dy & IC where I instigated and put myself into it first, i'll wait.
If I felt Dy was losing this I would of just not spoken at all as they won the set regardless and they can handle it themselves. However ****ting on javi's plan is much more fun for me so I decided to go with that instead.
You guys are also forgetting I guess the best player in the game is from Dy who has a big advantage. You guys have 10 mangonels scattered all over the middle on different parts that wont even be attacking docks for a while.. you have 4 that are near redrums 20 war galleys and Dy has 2 fully built tcs already pumping vills, do you know what happens when more vills get made? It's already 6 vills vs 2 at this point. Then its 7.. then its 8.. then its 9. Do you also know what happens when more buildings get produced much faster? More military units are made.
Sorry that I have to dumb this down so much for the ****ed latino alliance to understand but im doing my best here.
God, what they do is talk pure **** to confuse, from the beginning the same.
I dropped x3 times in the lustful game, and came back, we waited 2-3 hours for Dy's team to come back, being a game still undecided.
Clearly rules, Crack or redrum could be replaced, or me /Demo, also since they both did not return, and we advanced other games (2 hours between them:Dodgeball,Gwarz,RCB) .//
The game was not obvious, DY advantage from vills 4/2, from tc 2/0, galleys 20/5.
But they had a clear disadvantage of militarily ground: IC Had 3 stables and 8 kts, for Dy 1 stable and 4 kts, you don't mention that, do you, Rick / Polaris? Great analysis by hiding figures that do not suit you, how impartial you are.
We(IC) also had 4 siege workshops and we had 10 catapults, and Dy only had 2 siege w, and 2 catapults.
The 2 villagers from Redrum were locked up, and the most probable is that Dy was going to run out of space to build, since the 3 of them were together in the same place.
And remember something, genius, in case you don't know, the monks can convert villagers, and there was a minimal chance that Mascherano (he had 2 monks) would get villagers again.
It was clear that it was the deadline, and each game had to be played, I lost 30 minutes of time adding all the drops, so, I repeat, i do the forfeit in RCB, to recover that lost time.
Stop crying, that for every drop, I went back to the minute, I never stopped entering, and I agreed with the Army rule in the dodgeball v5 match (my favorite map and I dropped too), that if I dropped again, I would lose automatically.
The rules are clear, do not manipulate them in your view to appear impartial (when clearly arent).
The best player, who lost to Alex and Adrift in a lustful 2v2 tournament?
He is considered one of the best players in 1v1.
But in TG, everything changes, so just talk about Bloods, making comments on the air, to give depth to your poor argument.
If we go to the case, I consider demo the best in TG, and for that reason then IC, is favorable to win 90%, since Dy probably has no ideas of how to win in TG, ok ?, Think well before writing inconsistencies.
I am ashamed and sorry to explain this to you, but I understand, you will not have played more than 3 games in lustful.
There are transport ships, you know, those that transport units, villagers, you know, or do you want a picture?
You must login into Voobly to view image
By transporting the units in the mid, we were going to double Crack growth on the left (since redrum stopped building for fear of losing villagers).
Demo already had a kts inside the crack / green base, and was on his way to kill 2 villagers, didn't you mention that either?, Could have been 3/2 villagers after that.
I feel silly, explaining simple things to you from a simple map that you have not deigned to "learn" for fear of losing.
1v1 / 2v2 rounds, ended successfully, without any drop(6 games played, in which i participate in 4)? What are you talking about?
How old you? 25? Behave friend, you WON, you will not commit suicide by not losing to IC.
3v3 Random decider/Lustful, you didn't want to play it because you didn't want to.
Lustful doesn't count, much less do you have the moral authority to be securing a won game from a map you barely know.
Ashamed to lose vs you, but it's part of the game.
You cringe commanders need to stop acting like lustful is a 1000 IQ map and play style. Javi is currently one of the best players in lustful 1v1 that should say enough. Every part of that game was in Dy's favor.
They were 3 players vs 2.
They were 13 Docks vs 10 (6 were on a player with 0 vills and 7/5 pop at the time)
They had more military (not by much but still had more and had more buildings to create faster)
They had 2 tcs vs 0 (demo gonna be out of the game for atleast 2 mins building his tc)
They had more space by a lot. You guys had a cramped area on the middle with 1 vill. You had 10 mangonels on the middle some of which were nowhere near being able to start dock pushing or hindering Dy from building more docks.
This is all just common sense and doesnt need a vast amount of experience to understand or look at it. Dave on the stream who has tons of lustful exp said the game is over when he watched it. I encourage anyone to honestly come out who has a lot of lustful exp and tell me truthfully this game was in IC's favor the way Javi is doing and stand by it.
As I stated Javi has another motive for IC to get this point and make the set close as possible. I wish defending the ****ed latino alliance was the only reason but its not
just in addition, dy left to play random decider so its an AW for ic, 4-3.
remember all games has to be played on 3v3
In before the 5th post of the thread.
Not sure why other clans are posting on a Dy vs IC thread. Just saying.
Oh wait, this is CS. Drama and arguments in every thread.
Note: I did watch that game, and it was even frustrating as a spectator for him to keep dropping. Can people just say ggs and call it a day? Setting a great example for other players who might want to learn and play CS.
and please @army tell them to stop their bs with the "xcs plan", as you can see they can't even explain what is it, thats just for ****ing generate drama...
im out
sean you suck in lustful man, people would rather look towards my op than yours(even when you go and ask xcs about their op lmfao) when what do you want is get an exact answer, really it's like if I give my op in one smosh tg match and people would rather hear me than your op lol
I dropped x3 times in the lustful game, and came back, we waited 2-3 hours for Dy's team to come back, being a game still undecided.
If the game cannot be resumed, we will try to view the recorded game. If a player / team was to win without question, they will be awarded victory. If there was no obvious winner, the game will play in the same settings.
Clearly rules, Crack or redrum could be replaced, or me /Demo, also since they both did not return, and we advanced other games (2 hours between them:Dodgeball,Gwarz,RCB) .//
The game was not obvious, DY advantage from vills 4/2, from tc 2/0, galleys 20/5.
But they had a clear disadvantage of militarily ground: IC Had 3 stables and 8 kts, for Dy 1 stable and 4 kts, you don't mention that, do you, Rick / Polaris? Great analysis by hiding figures that do not suit you, how impartial you are.
We(IC) also had 4 siege workshops and we had 10 catapults, and Dy only had 2 siege w, and 2 catapults.
The 2 villagers from Redrum were locked up, and the most probable is that Dy was going to run out of space to build, since the 3 of them were together in the same place.
And remember something, genius, in case you don't know, the monks can convert villagers, and there was a minimal chance that Mascherano (he had 2 monks) would get villagers again.
It was clear that it was the deadline, and each game had to be played, I lost 30 minutes of time adding all the drops, so, I repeat, i do the forfeit in RCB, to recover that lost time.
Stop crying, that for every drop, I went back to the minute, I never stopped entering, and I agreed with the Army rule in the dodgeball v5 match (my favorite map and I dropped too), that if I dropped again, I would lose automatically.
The rules are clear, do not manipulate them in your view to appear impartial (when clearly arent).
Btw, the forum title doesnt say Eot either
Yes, Sean, start with your conspiracy theories, just like Zanchy accusing me of playing for another clan, and where is the evidence?
Without seriousness both
Just to talk to get attention and seem intellectual, you shouldn't even be here, just supporting Dy, to "seem impartial", when you hide the part that doesn't suit you, great
And yes, it is already agreed, xCs, would let me win 7-0, so that they beat Dy 7-0, ok?
That is your fear, there it is, you dont need to be mysterious, and then the clan of your best friend, whom you defend in every post, would get out ):, bad, it couldnt be the final Dy Vs Eot , behave maturely now.
If I felt Dy was losing this I would of just not spoken at all as they won the set regardless and they can handle it themselves. However ****ting on javi's plan is much more fun for me so I decided to go with that instead.
You guys are also forgetting I guess the best player in the game is from Dy who has a big advantage. You guys have 10 mangonels scattered all over the middle on different parts that wont even be attacking docks for a while.. you have 4 that are near redrums 20 war galleys and Dy has 2 fully built tcs already pumping vills, do you know what happens when more vills get made? It's already 6 vills vs 2 at this point. Then its 7.. then its 8.. then its 9. Do you also know what happens when more buildings get produced much faster? More military units are made.
Sorry that I have to dumb this down so much for the ****ed latino alliance to understand but im doing my best here.
I dropped x3 times in the lustful game, and came back, we waited 2-3 hours for Dy's team to come back, being a game still undecided.
Clearly rules, Crack or redrum could be replaced, or me /Demo, also since they both did not return, and we advanced other games (2 hours between them:Dodgeball,Gwarz,RCB) .//
The game was not obvious, DY advantage from vills 4/2, from tc 2/0, galleys 20/5.
But they had a clear disadvantage of militarily ground: IC Had 3 stables and 8 kts, for Dy 1 stable and 4 kts, you don't mention that, do you, Rick / Polaris? Great analysis by hiding figures that do not suit you, how impartial you are.
We(IC) also had 4 siege workshops and we had 10 catapults, and Dy only had 2 siege w, and 2 catapults.
The 2 villagers from Redrum were locked up, and the most probable is that Dy was going to run out of space to build, since the 3 of them were together in the same place.
And remember something, genius, in case you don't know, the monks can convert villagers, and there was a minimal chance that Mascherano (he had 2 monks) would get villagers again.
It was clear that it was the deadline, and each game had to be played, I lost 30 minutes of time adding all the drops, so, I repeat, i do the forfeit in RCB, to recover that lost time.
Stop crying, that for every drop, I went back to the minute, I never stopped entering, and I agreed with the Army rule in the dodgeball v5 match (my favorite map and I dropped too), that if I dropped again, I would lose automatically.
The rules are clear, do not manipulate them in your view to appear impartial (when clearly arent).
+1
[Eot_]Polaris_ says:
why not defending javi?

[Eot_]Polaris_ says:
he needs your help bro
good did.
He is considered one of the best players in 1v1.
But in TG, everything changes, so just talk about Bloods, making comments on the air, to give depth to your poor argument.
If we go to the case, I consider demo the best in TG, and for that reason then IC, is favorable to win 90%, since Dy probably has no ideas of how to win in TG, ok ?, Think well before writing inconsistencies.
I am ashamed and sorry to explain this to you, but I understand, you will not have played more than 3 games in lustful.
There are transport ships, you know, those that transport units, villagers, you know, or do you want a picture?
By transporting the units in the mid, we were going to double Crack growth on the left (since redrum stopped building for fear of losing villagers).
Demo already had a kts inside the crack / green base, and was on his way to kill 2 villagers, didn't you mention that either?, Could have been 3/2 villagers after that.
I feel silly, explaining simple things to you from a simple map that you have not deigned to "learn" for fear of losing.
King, you don't have enough internet to finish games, you should have been dq'd.
Army told me 5-2 , that's what it is. Move on. Feel proud he gave you the random round because the real score was 6-1.
How old you? 25? Behave friend, you WON, you will not commit suicide by not losing to IC.
3v3 Random decider/Lustful, you didn't want to play it because you didn't want to.
Lustful doesn't count, much less do you have the moral authority to be securing a won game from a map you barely know.
Ashamed to lose vs you, but it's part of the game.
GG 4-3.
They were 3 players vs 2.
They were 13 Docks vs 10 (6 were on a player with 0 vills and 7/5 pop at the time)
They had more military (not by much but still had more and had more buildings to create faster)
They had 2 tcs vs 0 (demo gonna be out of the game for atleast 2 mins building his tc)
They had more space by a lot. You guys had a cramped area on the middle with 1 vill. You had 10 mangonels on the middle some of which were nowhere near being able to start dock pushing or hindering Dy from building more docks.
This is all just common sense and doesnt need a vast amount of experience to understand or look at it. Dave on the stream who has tons of lustful exp said the game is over when he watched it. I encourage anyone to honestly come out who has a lot of lustful exp and tell me truthfully this game was in IC's favor the way Javi is doing and stand by it.
As I stated Javi has another motive for IC to get this point and make the set close as possible. I wish defending the ****ed latino alliance was the only reason but its not
remember all games has to be played on 3v3
In before the 5th post of the thread.
Not sure why other clans are posting on a Dy vs IC thread. Just saying.
Oh wait, this is CS. Drama and arguments in every thread.
Note: I did watch that game, and it was even frustrating as a spectator for him to keep dropping. Can people just say ggs and call it a day? Setting a great example for other players who might want to learn and play CS.