I have question its clans or hyper teams allowed

I'd suggest looking for people to form a team with if u wanna play.

Teams we have so far:
Dy
Eot
IC
RB
Habibi
xCs (unsure, don't trust a word plo talks)
Possible teams which need to form

It would 100% help to set some kind of deadline for interest/signups or the will fizzle away!

I'd suggest looking for people to form a team with if u wanna play.

Let's keep it very simple:

CS becomes "great again" when players go back to practicing variety instead of playing CBA/CBA Hero 24/7.

START PLAYING DIFFERENT SCENARIOS!!!

CS becomes great for you and your colleagues if that happens. It doesn't become great for the rest. CS needs more than variety. We already have hundreds of available scenarios that anyone can play if they want. The majority of CSers don't play them not because they are bad scenarios, but because CBA and Hero are enough to satisfy their gaming demands. Perhaps if these other scenarios (the actual good ones) were promoted more effectively, maybe you can start to introduce variety again. For example, instead of launching a new ladder and adding like 5 or 10 new maps to it, why don't you focus on promoting one new scenario at a time? Instead of having people spread playing several new scenarios, why not have all people learning the same one at the same time? Once that new scenario is mainstream, you can introduce a new one.

Personally, I don't think the people managing CS are doing a great job. I appreciate that they are willing to spend their fair time to help the community (although definitely some of them have ulterior motives), but we need new people at the top. I don't feel like there is ever any meaningful change. It's the same strategy being applied, and it's insane.

Before you ask why I don't or can't contribute, I'm simply too busy. And I'm not really actively complaining about the situation in CS, I'm just giving my opinion whenever I'm provided a platform to do so (i.e this and a few other recent threads).

+1, Agree with this guy

CS becomes great for you and your colleagues if that happens. It doesn't become great for the rest. CS needs more than variety. We already have hundreds of available scenarios that anyone can play if they want. The majority of CSers don't play them not because they are bad scenarios, but because CBA and Hero are enough to satisfy their gaming demands. Perhaps if these other scenarios (the actual good ones) were promoted more effectively, maybe you can start to introduce variety again. For example, instead of launching a new ladder and adding like 5 or 10 new maps to it, why don't you focus on promoting one new scenario at a time? Instead of having people spread playing several new scenarios, why not have all people learning the same one at the same time? Once that new scenario is mainstream, you can introduce a new one.

Personally, I don't think the people managing CS are doing a great job. I appreciate that they are willing to spend their fair time to help the community (although definitely some of them have ulterior motives), but we need new people at the top. I don't feel like there is ever any meaningful change. It's the same strategy being applied, and it's insane.

Before you ask why I don't or can't contribute, I'm simply too busy. And I'm not really actively complaining about the situation in CS, I'm just giving my opinion whenever I'm provided a platform to do so (i.e this and a few other recent threads).

Will this materialise or not?