I would like to propose doing an unofficial 2v2 league where the prize is games and maybe bragging rights.
Set
CBA - Celt / Britons
CBA Hero - Chinese / Japanese
Lustful Encounters - Spanish/Saracens
Smosh - Doesn't matter
Random - Team Random
Example of a leader board:
Camp/Zorat x points
Camp/Blodi x points
Zorat/Blodi x points
Zanchy/Alex x points
Alex/Camp x points
If you have four players, the different combinations of team will be counted seperately. Camps record with zorat is independent of his record with blodi.
They are interesting because you do not need to make houses, it gives games with posibility of go vill walls, but you dont know about tactics like that and this is your league so do wtv you want
They are interesting because you do not need to make houses, it gives games with posibility of go vill walls, but you dont know about tactics like that and this is your league so do wtv you want
playing with Huns gives the possibility of doing techniques like enemy wall vills (I found out not long ago the olds never do that and I am one of the few that plays like that the Huns)
it is not lame, it's just another style of play ... lame is that 2v1 goes to your partner in lustful or that they just play full monks (which is damn nasty)
No, this is designed to be simple to play for anyone. With no downside to having a bad teammate for one of the sets. I'll figure out a way to weigh scores for the level of your ally.
Basic idea:
If you team a good player and beat two bad players you won't get many points on the leaderboard. If you team a newer player and win just one game it would be worth as much as a 5-0 with an unfair matchup.
Expanded:
Simplest way to do it is have a baseline of 5 points for each set. If teams are equal you get a point a game. If teams are mismatched there will be a penalty to the overpowered team and bonus to the weaker team.
Example 1: Alex and Zanchy vs Camp and Zorat
This is fairly even so would be a normal ranking.
Example 2: malte and vezir vs bob and azery
This would be an unfair matchup and thus the dv8 team score values would be reduced by a certain amount, lets say maximum they could earn is .4 for each win, five wins would mean 2 points. For bob and azery they would receive 1.4 for a win.
Set
CBA - Celt / Britons
CBA Hero - Chinese / Japanese
Lustful Encounters - Spanish/Saracens
Smosh - Doesn't matter
Random - Team Random
Example of a leader board:
Camp/Zorat x points
Camp/Blodi x points
Zorat/Blodi x points
Zanchy/Alex x points
Alex/Camp x points
If you have four players, the different combinations of team will be counted seperately. Camps record with zorat is independent of his record with blodi.
Que?
it is not lame, it's just another style of play ... lame is that 2v1 goes to your partner in lustful or that they just play full monks (which is damn nasty)
Aztec + spa (monks / land and sea war)
Goth + Chinesse (demoship + spam halbs)
Saracens + koreans (sea war + onagers)
Huns + goth (amazing on imperial war games 11)
Byz + vikings (fireships)
Huns + spa (here works everythings)
Basic idea:
If you team a good player and beat two bad players you won't get many points on the leaderboard. If you team a newer player and win just one game it would be worth as much as a 5-0 with an unfair matchup.
Expanded:
Simplest way to do it is have a baseline of 5 points for each set. If teams are equal you get a point a game. If teams are mismatched there will be a penalty to the overpowered team and bonus to the weaker team.
Example 1: Alex and Zanchy vs Camp and Zorat
This is fairly even so would be a normal ranking.
Example 2: malte and vezir vs bob and azery
This would be an unfair matchup and thus the dv8 team score values would be reduced by a certain amount, lets say maximum they could earn is .4 for each win, five wins would mean 2 points. For bob and azery they would receive 1.4 for a win.