1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests
0 members, 1 guests
What's popular right now:








AoKTS updates (88 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (46 users)

Word Association (39 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (35 users)

[Dy] vs xCs Clan War 2019 (30 users)

1.6 reward campaing (29 users)

TIW 2020 Map votes (27 users)
Most active threads in past week:








Strange bug (6 posts)

Unable to spec 1.6 game data games (4 posts)

a problem in download (4 posts)

Nobody can play 1.6 anymore. (4 posts)

Elite skins for 1.6 (3 posts)

THis record just pauses and im u... (3 posts)

Is this game supported? (2 posts)
Let this be the first and LAST warning to anyone thinking it's clever and fun to ruin a genuine poll.
When we catch you you WILL be BANNED on Voobly. This is not a mere ban on your account, you will NOT get back on Voobly to play on ANY name at all.
I hope this is clear enough warning to the ****s. We will not tolerate it.
I would just like to point out the fact that this poll clearly had many loop holes and wasn't thought through fully. For a start the poll was open on aoc zone and voobly, where it is very easy to make new accounts to vote with. It wasn't specified if players could vote on both sites or not, i didn't even see it said anywhere, that voting on multiple accounts was not allowed, i think i would compare it to an election where voters can help themselves to voting cards, or perhaps even on television shows where voting multiple times on the telephone is allowed? Do you really expect someone to not abuse the system when its clear the people voting for the competitor is doing the same? It is obvious that the votes for Andorin and Mbl, were not made all by different people, so i think it would be a severe overreaction to ban anyone, considering no rules for the poll were made, and there was several loop holes. I think the best thing to do is put in place some rules and measures to prevent this happening in the future, such as restricting it to one vote per IP, or only accounts with a certain number of games played.
Secondly in my opinion Phant0m's view is extremely biased considering the fact that he was the one accusing the system of failing and when he found out that Mbl and Liivet made fake accounts to vote, his view changed, hence the request for leniency towards those guilty.
I believe strict punishment should be given to those guilty and measures should be taken to prevent this from happening again. The punishment would serve as an example to imbeciles who think they can out smart the system and expect to get away.
Secondly in my opinion Phant0m's view is extremely biased considering the fact that he was the one accusing the system of failing and when he found out that Mbl and Liivet made fake accounts to vote, his view changed, hence the request for leniency towards those guilty.
I believe strict punishment should be given to those guilty and measures should be taken to prevent this from happening again. The punishment would serve as an example to imbeciles who think they can out smart the system and expect to get away.
Where exactly did my opinion change? i never said anyone should be punished, all i said was that steps should be taken to stop this in the future.
Anyway this isnt about you.
People who have abused the privilege of having a fair poll must be punished strictly regardless of whether he is your friend or not.
Anyway this isnt about you.
People who have abused the privilege of having a fair poll must be punished strictly regardless of whether he is your friend or not.
GET LOST
Isnt that solid proof?
Stop being pathetic Liivet and man up to what you did. Any sane person who listened to the stream will know that you were not joking about voting for mbl multiple times.
Act mature and deal with the consequences instead of running away from it like a little girl trying to cover up your tracks.
Update: Liivet just confessed to making 7 accounts to vote on voobly.
I can confirm that is incorrect. If you heard it being said then I can assure you the action was not completed.
Only 1 vote was cast.