Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > CBA Same 1v1 Discussion

CBA Same 1v1 Discussion

 LePoop


Join Date: 15 December 2012
Posts:237
Posted 15 January 2013 - 9:25 pm
Not this again ;w00t people are just gonna say the civs they are good at, these are the unsuitable civs for 1v1

Byzantines: Can't really get an advantage with a patrol with that civ, whoever camps more should win.
Franks: Same as Byzantines but twice as bad, whoever fights closer to their base will win.
Huns: Hun war can go on indefinitely, it is too easy to block your towers, can work well for a CBA Hero game though.
Mayans: Takes too long for a tourney, games can last for 2 hours+.
Persians: All of the above reasons.

All other civs are fine, people who disagree or say they are noob civs probably just suck at them.
Link | Reply | Quote
 EorltheYoung


Join Date: 2 November 2012
Posts:335
Posted 15 January 2013 - 10:07 pm
LePoop wrote:
Not this again ;w00t people are just gonna say the civs they are good at, these are the unsuitable civs for 1v1

Byzantines: Can't really get an advantage with a patrol with that civ, whoever camps more should win.
Franks: Same as Byzantines but twice as bad, whoever fights closer to their base will win.
Huns: Hun war can go on indefinitely, it is too easy to block your towers, can work well for a CBA Hero game though.
Mayans: Takes too long for a tourney, games can last for 2 hours+.
Persians: All of the above reasons.

All other civs are fine, people who disagree or say they are noob civs probably just suck at them.

Could you expand on that by telling me which civs are virtually identical and therefore redundant?
Link | Reply | Quote
 RIP_Vanthom


Join Date: 16 July 2012
Posts:622
Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:43 pm
I disagree with Celts , although it is played more commonly , I think Japs/Goths would be a better choice for infantry my reason being Celts is too much of a distraction civ and speed rather than a patrol civ. However this could be a reason for it , personally I find them just annoying to play with 1v1.
But for archer Mongols is definitely played the most.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [sT]thunderbird


Join Date: 30 November 2009
Posts:686
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:58 am
japs..neither too fast nor too slow, just the perfect speed.
Link | Reply | Quote
 PrinceAbooAboo


Join Date: 6 June 2012
Posts:703
Posted 16 January 2013 - 1:01 am
Should do goths. :)
Link | Reply | Quote
 Carcharoth


Join Date: 3 January 2013
Posts:42
Posted 16 January 2013 - 1:12 am
aztecs
Link | Reply | Quote
 [GG]F1NaL_


Join Date: 8 July 2009
Posts:242
Posted 16 January 2013 - 2:17 am
I thinks that should be celts because is the civ most played in cba 1v1.. besides there are many players, and be more fun
Link | Reply | Quote
 LePoop


Join Date: 15 December 2012
Posts:237
Posted 16 January 2013 - 5:12 am
Could you expand on that by telling me which civs are virtually identical and therefore redundant?
They're all pretty much the same. Patrol, change stances, stop, repatrol, make some distractions. Really isn't much to it, if you're good at one I see no reason why you shouldn't be good at the others with some practice.
The ones that are more similar are the infantry civs, all the archer civs are played quite differently.
Link | Reply | Quote
 calexus5678


Join Date: 25 July 2008
Posts:1073
Posted 16 January 2013 - 5:43 am
I disagree with Celts , although it is played more commonly , I think Japs/Goths would be a better choice for infantry my reason being Celts is too much of a distraction civ and speed rather than a patrol civ. However this could be a reason for it , personally I find them just annoying to play with 1v1.
But for archer Mongols is definitely played the most.

The problem with japs is it often takes too long becoming an imp deadlock with neither player able to take the advantage.
Link | Reply | Quote
 BeNzYY


Join Date: 10 October 2011
Posts:2036
Posted 16 January 2013 - 5:46 am
Aztecs
Link | Reply | Quote
 Wormy24


Join Date: 4 July 2012
Posts:105
Posted 16 January 2013 - 7:08 am
['RB']Dan wrote:
persians

:)
but persians need 4 razes
i would pick persians for CBA hero
Link | Reply | Quote
 [_MD_]DaGhostInside


Join Date: 21 September 2008
Posts:738
Edited 16 January 2013 - 7:11 am by [_MD_]DaGhostInside
Just do Celt/Mong/Japs, most civs in 1vs1 are pretty r etarded and they all got flaws.
If you want to add aztec or goth instead of japs fine but lets just say that it will end after the first patrol.
Link | Reply | Quote
 Carcharoth


Join Date: 3 January 2013
Posts:42
Edited 16 January 2013 - 11:38 am by Carcharoth
;1thumbup Post Imp eles rape cage eles can make a move on the enemy easily and take a tower or just kill him :). All in the kills for that one imo.
Link | Reply | Quote
 yugantar


Join Date: 27 February 2012
Posts:1
Posted 16 January 2013 - 2:58 pm
huns are best for 1v1 because it is very easy to use lcav rush as 10% faster stable production
Link | Reply | Quote
 [7th]Like_Gg___


Join Date: 4 March 2009
Posts:1278
Posted 16 January 2013 - 2:58 pm
All vs vezir thread 11

If i were hosting a 1v1 cba i will pick diferent civs as spa - china - aztks / (teuts?). Im not cba player but i think there are not bad


Link | Reply | Quote
1[2]3
Displaying 16 - 30 out of 41 posts
Forum Jump:
1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests

Aktivste Beiträge der letzten Woche: