Italians too overpowered

 _I3acI__BLooD_


Joined:  28 Tháng 12 2012
Posts: 10
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 3:58 pm
Does anyone else think that the italians are really overpowered?
They're special unit is an archer that has a large bonus over cavalry. They have bbc, and bbt. It costs 10% less to advance through ages. trade units cost 50%...seems like a god civ in bf
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 KnightMon


Joined:  9 Tháng 3 2012
Posts: 39
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 4:13 pm
I've seen many people saying that the Slavs **** the Italians, Other says that the Incas are overpower, and other that the Saracens are overpower, that the Indians have a unbeteable elephant... bla, bla, bla I think that each civi have his advantage
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 Veteran_SouL


Joined:  5 Tháng 3 2012
Posts: 94
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 5:02 pm
proves it now and give you my noob opinion (and traduction) ;huh
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 [ViCiouS]Marauder


Joined:  19 Tháng 12 2009
Posts: 4071
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 5:52 pm
The incas have a pretty sweet unique unit too, and they create almost instantaniously
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 KD2K


Joined:  11 Tháng 8 2007
Posts: 84
Đã được sửa29 Tháng 12 2012 - 6:37 pm bởiKD2K
I remember in DM when Koreans were introduced into team games, everyone complained that they were overpowered. Koreans are still part of AoC, but people learnt to adapt and figured out how to beat Kors. They are still immensely annoying if played right (due to range of siege onager), but understand that is its advantage, just like eagles being strong raiders for mayans...

I guess in RM you could say turks can be overpowered in team games. I think if there are tweaks to be done it should borrow World of Warcraft's mentality when balancing.

'We don't reduce the desirability of playing something that is considered overpowered, we make better that which falls short.'

Hint: Vikings on land.
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 [ A ]Noted


Joined:  26 Tháng 9 2009
Posts: 1762
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 9:48 pm
The first time u fight a teutonic knight with a mameluke, you would say that teutons are overpowered. This is the same concept
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 cardios94


Joined:  5 Tháng 12 2010
Posts: 1
đã Post29 Tháng 12 2012 - 10:04 pm
noteroi you are my new god
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 Slash


Joined:  2 Tháng 6 2013
Posts: 3155
đã Post30 Tháng 7 2014 - 9:42 am
i like incas~!
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 [aGx]duckcity


Joined:  29 Tháng 7 2013
Posts: 766
Đã được sửa30 Tháng 7 2014 - 1:22 pm bởi+chris@voobly
on topic though: italian archers are still hardcountered by rams
Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
 calexus5678


Joined:  25 Tháng 7 2008
Posts: 1073
đã Post30 Tháng 7 2014 - 1:37 pm
KD2K wrote:
I remember in DM when Koreans were introduced into team games, everyone complained that they were overpowered. Koreans are still part of AoC, but people learnt to adapt and figured out how to beat Kors. They are still immensely annoying if played right (due to range of siege onager), but understand that is its advantage, just like eagles being strong raiders for mayans...

I guess in RM you could say turks can be overpowered in team games. I think if there are tweaks to be done it should borrow World of Warcraft's mentality when balancing.

'We don't reduce the desirability of playing something that is considered overpowered, we make better that which falls short.'

Hint: Vikings on land.

Well they actually reduced Koreans max onager range by one in 1.0c cos they were owning everyone which kind of goes against what you are saying.. lol


Đường dẫn | Trả lời | Trích dẫn
[1]
Hiển thị 1 - 10 ngoài 10 Bài viết
Nhảy Forum
1 User(s) làđọc chủ đề này 30 phút vừa qua
0Thành viên1 Khách

过去一周最活跃的帖子: