49 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 49 guests
0 members, 49 guests
Lo más popular ahora:








CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (62 usuarios)

AoKTS updates (58 usuarios)

Word Association (47 usuarios)

1.6 reward campaing (30 usuarios)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (28 usuarios)

TIW 2020 Map votes (20 usuarios)

BF EB - Round 3 [Final] (17 usuarios)
Temas más activos de la semana:








I can't open the lobby screen (5 mensajes)

Port Forwarding AOE 16000 (3 mensajes)

sale varias pantallas (2 mensajes)

Un-mutable spam about 1.6 (2 mensajes)

Signing in... Downloaded 96 B (2 mensajes)

I cannot pass the network diagno... (2 mensajes)

Error Lost connection to the server (1 mensajes)
circumstantial -> tardiness
Dependent was the most recent participant word.
Singular
(A matrix is singular iff its rows/columns are linearly dependent)
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
I already stated above that something that's circumstantial is dependent but this is after the fact. First, imo, something that is circumstantial needs to be specified in order for the word dependent to be put into play. And you can't say the word dependent at any time... not if it's been said recently per the rules you made in the original post. I think the main issue I'm having is that they're both adjectives and shouldn't directly lead to each other like I said before.
particular
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
At any rate, for the sake of keeping this moving, I will accept particular.
Existence
I'm not sure how this thread will ever end...
I'm used to cause and effect.... not cause, effect, and back to cause.
(e.g. AB -> A + B compared to AB -> A + B -> C ... where C would be another reactant not directly related to A and B other than it being another subject/noun/group/adjective...)