Community Forums > Voobly General > Tournament Archive > 7th v Dv8 and Xcel Friends

7th v Dv8 and Xcel Friends

 Faravahar


Joined:  19 August 2014
Posts: 1456
Posted 1 April 2015 - 3:23 pm
Nova 135 vs 246 isnt sides.. need to make it 123 vs 456.
"Colours must either be top v bottom (1234 v 5678) or odds v even (1357 v 2468)."
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [Eot_]Trumplaris


Joined:  1 January 2010
Posts: 7526
Posted 1 April 2015 - 3:26 pm
Spots/Postions/Civs for Maps
When a clan picks a home map they will have the choice of colours they prefer along with which civs will be played as long as the games are side v side. In the random games spots for 2v2 and 3v3/4v4 we ask you to pick either odds v even (1357 v 2468) or top v bottom (1234 v 5678) and obviously mirror civs

If you're gonna quote something atleast put the entire thing there... I'll extra bold the part about side v side if you want me to?

the 1357 or 1234 is because some maps are sides in 1234 and some are 1357.. there are also some which need different setup for sides but point is the games are played in side v side.
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [Eot_]Marvel__


Joined:  17 February 2012
Posts: 6631
Posted 1 April 2015 - 3:27 pm
It says in the random games spots can be that Damian, for home maps it has to be sides.

I think that nova is gay when played sides, but rules are rules...
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Joined:  2 July 2007
Posts: 3332
Edited 1 April 2015 - 4:10 pm by [I3acI]_Army1_
Yep thats the rules, they where made before vote picks where made and yeah nova is alot better played odds v evens for everyone for sure. I dont mind making an exception for nova being odds v even if everyone is happy with it?
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Faravahar


Joined:  19 August 2014
Posts: 1456
Posted 1 April 2015 - 4:21 pm
Why would anyone play side vs side Nova Sean? Why not just delete spam posts Army?
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [Eot_]Trumplaris


Joined:  1 January 2010
Posts: 7526
Posted 1 April 2015 - 4:29 pm
Why would anyone play side vs side Rad? (1234 vs 5678) ask yourself why karma is a ****.

Maybe if you were more reasonable to deal with people would go out of their way to be the same way with you... but this isnt Eot vs 7th... its dv8's choice if they want to play doubles or sides... I was only pointing out the rules to you that games are supposed to be played with side v side positions.
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Faravahar


Joined:  19 August 2014
Posts: 1456
Edited 1 April 2015 - 4:35 pm by Faravahar
Idc, do 123v456 then to make Sean happy 11
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [Eot_]Trumplaris


Joined:  1 January 2010
Posts: 7526
Posted 1 April 2015 - 4:51 pm
its dv8's choice if they want to play doubles or sides... I was only pointing out the rules to you that games are supposed to be played with side v side positions.
if dv8 is fine with doubles then all is good and enjoy your games... Army already said he would make an exception but both need to agree ;)
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Faravahar


Joined:  19 August 2014
Posts: 1456
Posted 1 April 2015 - 5:06 pm
Okay we go Vets then (sorry didnt' know rules about side vs side).
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Kuvvy


Joined:  24 July 2007
Posts: 3041
Posted 1 April 2015 - 5:30 pm
Gwarz Civ is changed to Teuton. FYI.
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Kuvvy


Joined:  24 July 2007
Posts: 3041
Posted 1 April 2015 - 6:28 pm
Ok. We also veto "Path".
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Faravahar


Joined:  19 August 2014
Posts: 1456
Posted 1 April 2015 - 6:38 pm
Is it allowed for us to pick Gwarz for the 3v3 also? If so we pick Gwarz all Teutons too.
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Kuvvy


Joined:  24 July 2007
Posts: 3041
Posted 1 April 2015 - 6:44 pm
Yes. You are allowed to pick Gwarz since you didn't choose of it in any of rounds till now.
So Army, it's all set. Make sure theres no more changes so we can practice maps till Saturday.
btw 18:00 GMT ok for you?
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 [I3acI]_Army1_


Joined:  2 July 2007
Posts: 3332
Edited 1 April 2015 - 7:27 pm by [I3acI]_Army1_
So am i right with the following

Dv8/xcel:

3v3/4v4
CBA - Civs Chinese/Vikings/Celt - Player 1,3,5
WoA - Huns/Spanish/Frank/Briton - Side vs Side?

2v2
AB - Civ Saracen - Player 1,2

1v1
CBA Hero - Civ Goth - Player 1
Gwarz - Civ Teuton - Player 1

All 3 vetos used - 3v3/4v4 Path, 3v3/4v4 Spider and 3v3/4v4 Graves

7th:

3v3/4v4
Vets - Civ Japs - Side v Side?
Gwars - Civ Teut - Side v Side?

2v2
Graves - Civ Huns - Player 1, 2

1v1
Germs - Celts - Player 2
Khans - Mongols - ?

2 vetos used on 1v1 Ab and 3v3/4v4 Europe leaving them with 1 veto to use

Date: Saturday the 4th at 6pm GMT
Lien | Répondre | Citation
 Kuvvy


Joined:  24 July 2007
Posts: 3041
Posted 1 April 2015 - 7:43 pm
They did pick 1v1 RCB. Not Germs.


Lien | Répondre | Citation
123[4]567
Displaying 46 - 60 out of 96 posts
Raccourcis de forum
1 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 1 guests

Most active threads in past week:
Can not update (2 posts)