Love that

But 2v2 same civ will probably become a clan war with members of good clans will team up and will have an edge over others. For ex members of Xcel might team and form 2-3 teams and they will probably will be better than non clan members who seek for their team. So I think that 3v3 was a good idea in my opinion. That will not solve the problem but will probably will reduce it.
Anyway but we are always up for it.

Traditionally XceL don't win these. It depends if Dv8 and 7th put up teams, then you have sauce (fujative/like_gg) daghost and his partner, eot maybe.

In any case there are a lot of good 2v2 teams. Plus, with practice, anyone can win these things.

As i have read above i want to have ur more intentions towards 2x2 same civ matches. In it we can do BO3 for example we can have all same civ match of infanatry in first round(like all japs or any other infanatry). And in second same civ match we will have all same civ match of archery(like all mongols or mayans or any other archery). And in last match we can have a combo match(like celts+mayans or mongols+sara or any other combo as players will agree on the spot). I want opinions of you guys on this idea. I hope all of you will like it.
With Regards,
Pawan

OK then. We got a start.

So, to be clear, we want to do at least three cba 4v4 tournaments on different days/times.
Two 2v2 tournaments.

3v3 im not sure if we'll do same or random, what do you guys think?

Lets do 4v4 random and 2v2 mirror first and then we will think of 3v3.
3v3 mirror can also be also be unfair based on positions and experts might not want to play 3v3 random.
So 3v3 will be a tough call..
might be a noob idea but maybe we could try 123 vs 678 ™ with 4 and 5 being AIs which resign at the start of the game..just to bring about some kind of variety.. (Idea already patented

Its not a bad idea and it would be different. Hmm. We would need a special map that changes spots though. People would get confused having to set AI players. We shall see how easy it would be to make a special 3v3 map. Someone should ask map makers, try jack neals. He might be able to convert the triggers with a script.

What about smurfs..How are we gonna deal with them? ( In case they have 2 or more diff IP)

+1 for this idea

I don't think map makers will make it in very short period of time..........so Aswin's idea is good to me

I talked to Jack..

Jack_Neals says:
if you want change players position you have to remake the whole map
Jack_Neals says:
or yea as you said, i could make a script which do some traitments to the actual map
Jack_Neals says:
and then generate a new map with what you want automatiquelly
Jack_Neals says:
it is much work yea
Jack_Neals says:
the script isn't made to edit maps like this
Jack_Neals says:
and i'm not the creator of the base of the script which is complex
Jack_Neals says:
so no i can't do this

Try Krymth_ or Pine or someone?

Ah it was only a thought. If he can't do it nobody can do it.

Forget it we'll just do regular 3v3.

If u want to do same civs in 3x3 then positions will surely matter sir Barry

Possibly a fast civ on p5 and p6 position will do good. For ex : Byz,hun,mong,span,celt too .
Position not much problematic in same civ. Yes it s a problem in random civ but we are'nt doing that.

I will be p1, p3, p5 vs p2, p4, p6

Yes its a good idea to place fast civs at the remote spots.