Community Forums > General > General Discussion > Suggested Voobly Rating Decay IMPORTANT PLEASE READ

Suggested Voobly Rating Decay IMPORTANT PLEASE READ

Poll: Do you want a Rating Decay System on Voonly
Strongly Agree
Agree
Don't care
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 DarkerKnight


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 19 February 2011
Posts:37
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:26 pm
[VCOM]Antu wrote:
I agree but it should be 30days NOT 10
+1
Link | Reply | Quote
 DarkerKnight


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 19 February 2011
Posts:37
Edited 26 November 2012 - 9:30 pm by DarkerKnight
10 days is too less...make it a month... that makes things fair... sometimes i dont get time to play for over an week.. its genuine reason for many people in here.... 30 days makes more sense and hits only the real thing... may be after 30 u can reduce the next 20 pts in 20 days and so on.. so as to get ur objective as well..
Link | Reply | Quote
 d3Xter


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 11 August 2012
Posts:3494
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:31 pm
Strongly disagree because in the summer time some people cant play ,for example me..and doesnt seem to be fair taking 20 points each 15 days..

Man send 200$ minimum amount > i make personal rules for u.
Link | Reply | Quote
 BEST_GIRL6


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 9 July 2007
Posts:139
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:32 pm
eh...the idea is good, but i think 1 game every 10 days is kinda....meh dont think itll change much
Link | Reply | Quote
 [TeG]Breakinth0ughts


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 31 March 2011
Posts:76
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:34 pm
this is lame, maybe some ppl have a life and they go in vacation or they work so much and they want to rest 10 days(no gaming) and u want to take them their points???1 to 10 how stupid is that? Instead of doing iluminati things or whatever they doing u might try bring something usefull.totaly disagree, and i think this new rating system it's designed by stupid ppl.
Link | Reply | Quote
 Reus__


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 1 October 2011
Posts:5
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:35 pm
maybe open whole new ladder for this ?
i dont see why ppl should be "punished" for beeing inactive.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [ViCiouS]SvoQ


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 24 October 2012
Posts:874
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:37 pm
i think 10 days is good enough. if you cant play due to exams or vacations.. then you should probably stop thinking about aoc for a while and enjoy your vacation and pass your examns first. rofl its purpose is to flush out and clean ladder. not keep pt/smurf in it and give them enough time to actually play games in each acc :S ;glare :P
Link | Reply | Quote
 [VCOM]Antu


Group: Voobly Promoter
Join Date: 14 September 2008
Posts:224
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:39 pm
if somebody hasnt played for a month, you cant expect same performance in game from him. so i agree with the idea but it should be 30 days NOT 10. "This process will eventually remove Banned players and inactive smurfs from all ladders " which is good, too..
Link | Reply | Quote
 d3Xter


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 11 August 2012
Posts:3494
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:41 pm
i think 10 days is good enough. if you cant play due to exams or vacations.. then you should probably stop thinking about aoc for a while and enjoy your vacation and pass your examns first. rofl its purpose is to flush out and clean ladder. not keep pt/smurf in it and give them enough time to actually play games in each acc :S ;glare :P
Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro ;lol
Link | Reply | Quote
 Ae000


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 4 October 2012
Posts:46
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:42 pm
Strongly disagree, ratings are fine as they are; people are going to moan about them whatever you do.
Link | Reply | Quote
 TheLynx


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 27 January 2010
Posts:5
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:43 pm
This idea is wrong in so many ways. AOC isn't the kind of game to do it, imagine that I have two names (1900 and 2k2).
For some reason i reached 2k2 in a period when i was playing a lot etc and kept that name idle, i'm just playing on 1900 for now. One day appears daut with a 2k3 name waiting for a game, right away i log my account and try to join that run, can't. Maximum i could face would be some random 1700 with that decay.

Its stupid idea for itself. Also, its not everyone that plays it have 15y old and 24h free to play the game, 10days is so few that makes me lol. In a long term, i think more people will just give up with that decay system. My idea: totally super disagree, and yea, used to smurfing since ever.
Link | Reply | Quote
 Ramy_wool


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 19 September 2012
Posts:187
Edited 26 November 2012 - 9:44 pm by Ramy_wool
397 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes) O_o
The point score should be replaced by RANGES.
The points amount make people more crazy.
The range is more complete.
The range should be granted for games played and victories



btw, decay don't mean "decadencia" The right word is : disminuir
Decadencia mean lose social status, lose dignity, lose the glory etc.
Link | Reply | Quote
 [ VkA_]_cinzas


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 10 August 2010
Posts:88
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:44 pm
Strongly Agree
Link | Reply | Quote
 ['RB']Dan


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 17 May 2012
Posts:7308
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:45 pm
Ae000 wrote:
Strongly disagree, ratings are fine as they are; people are going to moan about them whatever you do.

Talking about masta again?
Link | Reply | Quote
 commentatore


Group: Standard Membership
Join Date: 10 November 2011
Posts:28
Posted 26 November 2012 - 9:46 pm
1 question:
how do u refresh ladders, since voobly isnt auto refresh.


Link | Reply | Quote
1234[5]6789101112131415161718192021»
Displaying 61 - 75 out of 346 posts
Forum Jump:
5 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
1 members, 4 guests
Google

Most active threads in past week: